Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« All Your Wombs Are Belong to U... | Breaking News: Changes in Neum... »

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Update on Dino Rossi’s Lobbying Foundation

Posted by on June 15 at 16:14 PM

Mary Lane, the executive director of Dino Rossi’s new foundation, just called to tell me that the new group isn’t going to lobby legislators. They’re going to file w the PDC as a “grassroots lobbying” group, which means they can’t lobby legislators. They can only lobby the public…or “raise awareness.”

They will also have non-profit 501(c)(4) status, which means unlike 501(c)(3) nonprofits, they can take political positions and endorse candidates. They can’t, however, do independent ads targeted at the general public on behalf of candidates.

Lane says they aren’t going to take positions on candidates anyway. She says they’ll be doing mailings and ads directed at the public to advocate on state budget and fiscal issues. According to the PDC, if the group takes a position on any bill pending before the legislature it will have to disclose who’s supporting them financially. If they’re not dealing w specific legislation, but simply “raising awareness” on “issues” … it’s my understanding that they don’t have to disclose their donors.

I asked Lane if the new group was relying on Rossi’s recent donor list. She said “No, not really. Right now, we’re just relying on people Dino knows who are interested in fiscal responsibility issues.”

Lane also says the group will be non-partisan.

Oh, as to the bizarre photo of the U.S. Capitol, she just laughed and kept saying the group wasn’t officially up and running yet. Oh, and if you go to their site now…they’ve fixed it.

She also asked me if Charles Mudede still worked at The Stranger.

I said that he did. She then recounted a story that she clearly holds dear. She said she had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Mudede once at a bar on Pike Street during the 2004 election season, and when Charles found out she was Rossi’s communications director, he told her he thought she must be kidding. “You don’t really believe in that stuff?” she remembers a bewildered Mudede asking. He then told her that he was a Marxist. At this point, Lane was just as flabbergasted by Mudede as he was by her. He then tried to explain why being a Marxist was a wise decision in today’s corporate superstructure. Lane told him they’d have to agree to disagree. Good luck w that.


CommentsRSS icon

I love how being a corporate hack (good or bad) is now "grassroots". My other question was whether Lane spat up her drink when the words "Marxist" came from Mudede's mouth... that would be a picture for the Stranger archives I figure

Oh lord, i would pay good money to see Chuckles defend Marxism to any republican, let alone a gubernatorial candidate's campaign manager. Gold, pure gold.

umm... good loophole they found, goes down easy with the Bush League, but not this northwest progressive. Legislative "fiscal issues" are always political, that is why the founding fathers gave that responsibility to a group of people (the legislature) and not one person (the executive). And voters... shit. They knew that a group of people would bitch, moan, and try to 'work' for themselves. By design, no group gets everything they want from the government’s coffers, but 'fiscal issues' are always political. No matter how many Republican want to shout down otherwise to make reality conform to their beliefs.


So, Rossi and Lane want all of us to "volunteer" to be "citizen activists". And, why not be activists for them? That is the impression I get from this post and their website. And the loophole is that a "citizen activist" who, since they aren't bona-fide lobbyists, can talk to whoever they wish. And this sham of a group thinks, say what not organize the 'citizen activist league' around one message, but a message with many voices (but not a “political voice”, because as Lane and Rossi know, that would be “lobby” talking. This way, without a paid lobbyist and all those pesky laws , why now its just good ol’ fashion bitching, and bitching doesn’t have laws controlling it. Does it?)


Bullshit. Those “citizen activists” will be a part of that organization and will need to follow that organizations guidelines. (Otherwise, what is the fucking point of the organization?) Any person who speaks to a legislator is a lobbist, registered or not. The only difference is that Rossi's organization will buy them pens, maybe give them a phone and a desk, and train them on how to "talk-the-talk". Maybe even pay for transportation and lodging, if that is what the ‘citizen activist’ requires to have ‘non-political’ talk with a legislator.

Lane and Rossi will each draw paychecks, and hire a team of lawyers to run legal interference for those “citizen activists” lobbying efforts. They will continue to cheat the system by claiming they are a “non-profit” and aren’t doing a damn thing wrong and will vilify anyone who says otherwise. Fuckers both.

M. Phenics, yes, that is a loophole as are several thousand others throughout the country. From your side, try MoveOn.org.

Mary Lane is a breath of fresh air. She should have been governator.

Truth and justice is right - Mary "Marummy" Lane is "a breath of fresh air" w/ the scent of roses.

Marummy for Lt. Governor in 2008!

If you love freedom, you'll donate to the Forward Washington Foundation!!

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).