Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Southern Baptists | Redwood Update »

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Slog Exclusive: Darcy Burner Poll Numbers

Posted by on June 15 at 13:42 PM

President Bush arrives here tomorrow for a high-dollar fundraiser benefiting eastside Republican Congressman Dave Reichert. This will be Bush’s first western stop on a cross-country fundraising jag intended to help vulnerable Congressional Republicans hold onto their seats. But while the Bush visit is sure to help Reichert’s war chest (to the tune of $500,000-plus), it’s also something of a PR gift for Democrat Darcy Burner, who’s made a sport of tying Reichert to the deeply unpopular Bush.

A recent Burner campaign poll of 500 eastside voters, conducted from May 15 - 21 and released to The Stranger early this afternoon, shows just why Burner is so eager to hang the anvil of Bush’s sinking popularity around Reichert’s neck. Finding number one:

Bush’s job performance rating has plummeted to 26% (good or excellent) versus 73% (just fair or poor) with a majority (53%) rating his job performance as poor. Bush is extremely unpopular in the district, and tying Reichert to the Bush agenda drives voters to Burner.

This finding may be why, according to the Burner campaign, Bush is ditching the White House press corps for his visit with Reichert, sending them straight on to his next stop, New Mexico, instead of bringing them here. Reichert needs the money Bush can help raise, but he doesn’t need lots of major media stories highlighting his close relationship with a president who’s that unpopular on the eastside.

Other findings from the poll show low job-approval ratings for Reichert, even lower re-elect numbers for the freshman Congressman, trouble for Reichert among independent voters (who will be key to any victory in the 8th District), and an impressive jump in name recognition for Burner, a former political unknown.

Reichert’s own job performance rating is just 39% (good or excellent versus 43% just fair or poor), for a net negative job performance rating (-4%). The Republican-controlled Congress has even worse ratings in the district (21% good/excellent, 75% just fair/poor). Together, these low ratings foreshadow a strong desire for change among Washington 8th’s voters.

Reichert’s reelect numbers fell to 33%, a drop of 1% from Lake Research Partners polling conducted in October ‘05. The remaining two thirds of the electorate would consider voting for someone else, vote to replace Reichert, or aren’t sure. This is despite the fact that he has sent 6 pieces of franked mail in the last 6 months, which has clearly buoyed his numbers and solidified his base.

Independent voters disapprove even more of the job performances of Reichert, Bush, and the Republican-controlled Congress. Among independent voters, Reichert’s job rating is weak (37% good/excellent, 43% just fair/poor). Similarly, independents are more frustrated with Congress (15% good/excellent job, 80% just fair/poor job) and President Bush (21% good/excellent job, 78% just fair/poor job) than the electorate as a whole. These voters are dissatisfied and open to someone new.

With no paid communication, Burner has raised her name recognition ID with voters from 18% to 46%. Voters respond positively to her biography as daughter of an Air Force veteran and a public school teacher who put herself through college and went on to a successful career at Microsoft. Her message of running for Congress to change the direction of the country is very compelling.

The poll was conducted by Lake Research Partners and has a margin of error of +/-4.4%.

Meanwhile, a number of protests and rallies have been scheduled to coincide with Bush’s visit. Today a group of seniors are delivering a letter to Reichert’s Mercer Island offices complaining about policies—backed by Bush and Reichert—that they say are bad for seniors. (More on this later.) Tomorrow there will be a rally at Westlake Plaza in downtown Seattle starting at 11:30 a.m. and featuring Burner, State Democratic Party Chair Dwight Pelz, some King County councilmembers, some state legislators and, according to organizers, several hundred supporters. And also tomorrow: Some protesters will be over on the eastside, near the route that Bush’s motorcade is taking to the Reichert fundraiser in Medina, doing things that for the moment remain unclear to me.


CommentsRSS icon

Seems that Burner is really burning away while Reichert is trying desparately to rekindle his dying fire. If there ever was a clear chioce for the voters of the 8th Congressional District, this is it.

With Bush's low polling numbers you know he's not here to rally the troops. He's here to tap the faithful wealthy whose net worth he increased with his tax cuts for the millionaires at the expense of the rest of America.

By the way, is this trip being paid for by Reichert and the Republican Party or is Bush charging it to the taxpayers?

"...doing things that for the moment remain unclear to me."

Seriously, is it me or is Bush's sojourn into Western Washington almost as under-the-radar as his trip to Baghdad?

So, Eli, why didn't the poll ask the one question that matters? i.e. Would you vote for Dave Reichert or for Darcy Burner? Because the results weren't results you wanted to see?

And don't give me some lame answer about timing or how you're not supposed to ask that question at this time. Horseshit. The election is in less than 5 months. They should know by now that Burner is running against reichert for the 8th District seat and should know who they're leaning towards.

Gomez, of course the Burner campaign asked that question, and of course it will release only what fits its agenda. So what? Reichert would do the same thing. The simple fact of the matter is that he is an unusually vulnerable incumbent. Right now that is the news.

Eli - are you a reporter? And have you ever read a poll before?

The fact that you take VERY seletive data, from a month old poll taken over 6 days and make a big deal about it is pathetic.

I would suggest that it is a sign of desperation and zero traction for the Burner camp to push this crap to you...and you might as well admit that you have absolutely no clue as to the mechanics of campaign by swallowing hook-line-and-sinker. Neither of you have any credibility.

If they had good numbers, they would have relased more than these few questions and done so before the numbers got stale.

of course the Burner campaign asked that question, and of course it will release only what fits its agenda. So what? Reichert would do the same thing. The simple fact of the matter is that he is an unusually vulnerable incumbent. Right now that is the news.

Yadda yadda party line... So there's something the Burner camp don't want us to know. Great. That should send everyone's confidence sky high.

I bet they asked the question and Reichert had her number by at least 25 points. Because if she polled ahead of him, the camp would have gladly told us.

With Burner's name ID of only 46%, of course the head to head isn't going to be very good. But there's plenty of upside.

The scary thing for Reichert is that his reelect number is 33% - that's not even just below 50%, that's approaching Dick Cheney-an levels. And his name ID is probably sky-high, meaning he has little to no up side.

Weird to see all this interest in the 8th District from the publication that told residents of the "soul-less sprawling exurbs" to "FUCK OFF"

With Burner's name ID of only 46%, of course the head to head isn't going to be very good. But there's plenty of upside.

Well, neat. But with the election only five months away, that's an important fact to note. The election is in November, and not only is she trailing Reichert, not even half of polled voters know who she is, let alone what she stands for!

She bit off way more than she can chew. I'm in agreement with others who suggested that she start in a lower office and develop a following, experience and political credibility.

On the contrary, I would suggest that many Democratic activists in Seattle will be donating time and money to the Darcy campaign since we DON'T have to do so for McDermott.

There's plenty of summertime to get her name recognition up.

The funny thing is that WashPost won't even list her race as a likely upset.

Guess they don't get out to the West Coast much.

Well, clearly you have work to do. Time's a wastin', and back patting with the political cliques and niche media isn't gonna get it done.

Gomez' argument that Burner shouldn't run due to lack of experience is pretty pathetic. The incumbent's experience is minimal and almost universally regarded as rubber-stamping Bush's unpopular agenda. With less than 5 months to go, Burner's campaing certainly does have a lot of work to do, and I expect you will see her doing it (rather than merely sucking up to big donors).

Those of us that actually LIVE in the 8th have seen neither hide nor hair of the 'little candidate that wants to'... one would think her time would be better spent attempting to convince her district that she actually has something to offer rather than pandering to a few loony leftys in Seattle that can't offer her even one legititimate vote... and should those loony leftys venture into the 8th on her behalf...what do you think their reception will be?

Max, wasn't he King County Sheriff for a spell, and didn't he hold office for a couple decades before then? Darcy hasn't held office in her lifetime.

This is all rather amusing listing to the fine people of Seattle act like they have any idea what the people of the 8th congressional think and who they will vote. Burner has a snow flakes chance in hell out here. But please Seattle spend all the money you want on her, the fact that her support comes from Seattle is the kiss of death in the 8th

I have a question for Max, and others who like to say that Reichert is "almost universally regarded as rubber-stamping Bush's unpopular agenda". Have you ever taken the time to actually go check out Reichert's voting record?

Do a little independent research instead of just repeating something you heard someone say that sounded good to you.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).