<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Slog - Comments on Serving the President</title>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/06/serving_the_presiden</link>
<description>I&apos;ve been wondering when Congress would throw a hissy about President Bush basically nullifying their powers. From the Boston Globe: WASHINGTON -- The Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, Arlen Specter, said yesterday that he is &quot;seriously considering&quot; filing legislation to give Congress legal standing to sue President Bush over his use of signing statements to reserve the right to bypass laws. Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, made his comments after a Judiciary Committee hearing on signing statements, which are official documents that Bush has used to challenge the constitutionality of more than 750 laws when signing legislation . We&apos;ll see if this...</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2007</copyright>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:35:43 -0800</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:10:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Comment by el ganador</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>but then won't Bush have to return from Gaul to fight the Senate and take the title of Emperor? If Specter is Cato, who is Marc Antony?</p>]]></description>
<author>el ganador</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/06/serving_the_presiden#c384746</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/06/serving_the_presiden#c384746</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:00:23 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sachi</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The problem I have with all the articles about the signing statements is that they assert, as if it were a _fact_, that the statements "basically nullify [the laws'] powers."  That is not a fact -- it is something that Bush dearly wishes were true and he is acting as if it were true.  But I know of no authority in the Constitution for that proposition.<br /><br />
Bush's breach of his legal authority needs to be a much bigger issue than it is.<br /><br />
(I am admitted to practice law in Washington and California, for what it's worth.)</p>]]></description>
<author>Sachi</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/06/serving_the_presiden#c384755</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/06/serving_the_presiden#c384755</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:21:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Napoleon XIII</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>But since the President is in charge of enforcing the laws he says he's under no obligation to obey, how do you stop him from violating them?</p>]]></description>
<author>Napoleon XIII</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/06/serving_the_presiden#c384761</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/06/serving_the_presiden#c384761</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:27:03 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sachi</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm not an expert on political issues like that (I do criminal defense and I also follow higher education law) but, as far as I know, the only way to get Bush to behave is to impeach him and then remove him from office.  <br /><br />
Unfortunately the smug bastard knows it. He has no _ethical_ compass that would lead him to honor the oth of office or the Constitution.  So without a political check, he'll just do what he damn well pleases, and laugh all the way.  </p>]]></description>
<author>Sachi</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/06/serving_the_presiden#c384783</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/06/serving_the_presiden#c384783</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:46:19 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Will in Seattle</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The funny thing is that most of the signing statements will be used by a Dem president to make Bushies toe the line in just a couple of years.</p>]]></description>
<author>Will in Seattle</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/06/serving_the_presiden#c384796</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/06/serving_the_presiden#c384796</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:09:56 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Napoleon XIII</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Impeachment is certainly an option.  Would that our Senate, however, respect the precedents of its Roman forebearers...</p>]]></description>
<author>Napoleon XIII</author>
<link>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/06/serving_the_presiden#c385061</link>
<guid>http://slog.thestranger.com/2006/06/serving_the_presiden#c385061</guid>
<category>Politics</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:10:01 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>