Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« The Morning News | The Freykis Fracas: Pastor X W... »

Wednesday, June 7, 2006

As Expected: Senate Kills Anti-Gay Marriage Amendment

Posted by on June 7 at 8:13 AM

The 49-48 vote fell 11 short of the 60 required to send the matter for an up-or-down tally by the full Senate.

The Anti-gay marriage losers tried to spin it as a win.
(From MSNBC):

But ban supporters took solace in the fact that the idea received several new votes from Republican freshmen elected after the amendment received its last vote in 2004.

“We’re building votes,” Sen. David Vitter, R-La., a new supporter, said before the vote. “That’s often what’s required over several years to get there, particularly to a two-thirds vote.”

But here’s a little context check on that.
(From the NYT):

Supporters had predicted they would gain votes this year over the last time the issue came up, in 2004, but actually lost one vote for the amendment in a procedural test tally.

Wednesday’s 49-48 vote fell 11 short of the 60 required to send the matter for an up-or-down tally. The 2004 vote was 50-48.

*The NYT reports that 7 Republicans voted against the amendment. They forgot to add Joe Lieberman, who also voted against the amendment.

Here’s the roll call.


CommentsRSS icon

duh.

Too bad. I was hoping the Senate could tie itself up with inconsequential brain-dead rubbish like this all the way to the November elections.

Not that I'm entirely surprised that people so far removed from reality would be able to do basic arithmetic.

Did this vote break out on party lines? Seems so ........ so do we keep chanting there is no difference between Rs and Dems on Gay issues?

What say all those mouthy greens? There is not difference .... hell there isn't .....

Between this and and R-65 not getting enough signatures, this morning has brought some of the best political news in a long while. I am in a great mood today.

The best part (from today's PI:)

"Supporters lost three key "yes" votes. Two Republicans changed their votes from yes in 2004 to no this time: Sens. Judd Gregg of New Hampshire and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania. The third was Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., who did not vote this time because he was traveling with Bush."

I guess, to paraphrase Rumsfield, you go to a rushed meaningless vote that panders to your base with the Senate you have, not the Senate you want.

Meanwhile another $6 billion PER DAY was added to our national deficit. Hello, McFly! You're running our nation into the GROUND!

Joe Lieberman is a Democrat for another couple weeks at least. Geez, he votes with the caucus like, 85% of the time.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).