Politics Pike Place Politics
What he said.
As a straight guy who supports equal rights for gays, I don’t think the 43rd should send a gay or lesbian person to Olympia simply because the candidate is gay. All six Democrats support full marriage equality. All six supported recent civil rights legislation. This seems like the usual ‘Seattle-style identity politics.’ …Sending a heterosexual to Olympia as opposed to a homosexual seems like the least of concerns in the 43rd.
"All six Democrats support full marriage equality. All six supported recent civil rights legislation."
That's great that they support full marriage equality and recent civil rights legislation. But how many of them are active proponents of said causes? The following is from their web sites:
Jim Street: "As a city councilmember and as a judge, I saw these rights in moral as well legal terms. It is my job as a citizen to notice, to bring attention to and act against racism, homophobia, sexism and other forms of discrimination whenever I see them."
Lynne Dodson: "I strongly support full marriage equality for same-sex couples. My union was one of the first to sign on to the labor friend-of-the-court brief in the Andersen/ Castle marriage equality case before the state supreme court."
Bill Sherman: "Across the nation, anti-gay ballot measures target our friends and family members. This must stop. In addition, we need the legislature to ensure that the Anderson-Murray Civil Rights Act is implemented firmly and fairly. I'll fight for vigorous enforcement of these hard-earned rights, and for full marriage equality."
Stephanie Pure: "I will fight any attempt to undermine civil rights law in Washington, especially the gay-civil-rights bill recently passed in the Legislature. No sooner did Washington’s LGBT community win a great civil rights victory than it was threatened by discrimination and bias. I will work to ensure that all Washington residents are treated equally under the law."
Dick Kelley: "Dick Kelley believes that all couples- straight, gay and lesbian- should have an equal right to marry with full legal rights. The U.S. Constitution mandates that all persons have the equal protection of the law, and this issue is our generation’s application of that Constitutional right. Dick did not just take this position to win votes in this campaign. He has advocated equal rights for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered citizens for many years. During his four years as Chair of the 43rd District Democrats (2002-2006) he advocated in party meetings and platform deliberations for equal marriage rights. In March, 2004, when the right wing was pushing a U.S. Constitutional amendment to outlaw same-sex marriage, Dick used his credibility as District Chair and his column in the District newspaper to argue that Democrats, who unblinkingly support equal rights for other minorities, should take the same position on equal marriage rights."
Of these, based on the information on their campaign web sites, only Dodson and Kelley appear to have taken any action to support gay rights and marriage equality - and in Dodson's case it was only clear that her union, not she directly, was involved. Now, if any of the others HAVE actually done something for gay rights, let them demonstrate it by telling us what they've DONE - not what they will do.
While I don't believe that the 43rd has to go to a gay candidate by any means, saying that "all the candidates support marriage equality" doesn't portray an accurate picture of how someone will advocate on behalf of the gay community. After all, not supporting gay rights in the 43rd is election-day suicide.
Oh, and by the way, from Pedersen's site: " I just finished chairing the board of the national civil rights organization Lambda Legal, and serve as Lambda's lead volunteer lawyer on our state's marriage equality case."
Dan looks like he is cutting off his nose to spite his face because of his personal issues with Pedersen, whatever they may be.