Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Overheard in the Office | Bad News for Tent City IV »

Friday, June 9, 2006

Gates Foundation HQs

Posted by on June 9 at 16:52 PM

Announced in February 2005, the purchase of a 12-acre site next to Seattle Center for $50.4 million is the most expensive sale of city property in Seattle history. The City Council had to give it special fast-track approval. We even have to demolish one of our precious few skateparks.

So the pressure is on. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, your new headquarters better blow us away. Our demands: a malaria vaccine for every child in sub-Saharan Africa, plus iconic architecture on 5th Avenue North.

With a $27 billion endowment, you can do both.

Right now the foundation leases a former check-processing plant at 1551 Eastlake Ave. “We’re outgrowing it,” says spokeswoman Lisa Matchette. “Having this new headquarters will give us a long-term, permanent home and we’ll have the flexibility to have a campus-like design to expand as our programs grow. We’re planning to be there the next hundred years.”

The campus won’t open till 2010, but it’s being designed now. So the time for constructive criticism is now. Help the people who help the people.

Slideshow after the jump.

Here is what the foundation's future site looks like today, June 9, 2006:

From Harrison and 5th (Seattle Center is on your left; you're looking northeast):

Harrison&5th D.JPG

The above site will see the first construction: a parking garage, which will break ground this fall.

The garage will be mostly underground and its roof will be covered in plantlife, making it "a lot nicer to look at for all those people looking down from Queen Anne,” says Lisa Matchette, a spokeswoman for the Gates Foundation. Here is a graphic she gave us for the parking garage:

Garage image1.jpg


Back to the present day view of the site from Mercer and 5th (Seattle Center on the right; we're looking southeast):

Mercer&5th.JPG

That's where the headquarters will have its main entrance. But the whole campus, some 12 acres, will stretch all the way to Mercer and Broad. So massive is it, that this skatepark . . .

Skatepark D.JPG


. . . will get bulldozed. Special thanks to Tireless Stranger Intern Sarah Mirk for snapping those photos --- and for more on the skatepark snafu, see Sarah's story from last week.

That skatepark and all those Seattle Center parking lots will turn into this:

500Fifth.jpg


That is a very, very vague sketch of the future Gates Foundation HQ. So vague that the foundation tried to talk us out of posting it; I told them I'd attach a caveat. "It's meant to convey a feeling, rather than to be a representation,” says Matchette, of the sketch. The campus, she says, is going to be "a nice, peaceful place. We don't want a big fortress, so we're closed off and isolated. We want people to see through the campus — it will be very open.”

Matchette admits that the day-to-day tasks of the foundations 270 full-time workers tend toward the banal — "people typing at computers,” she says — but the foundation has hired Ralph Applebaum Associates to design its "visitors learning center” (They have yet to name it, so fire away if you have an idea). Applebaum designed the New York Public Library (pictured below)

NewYorkPL_1.jpg

. . . and the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum:

USHolocaust_1.jpg


Whatever the name, Matchette says the visitors center "will be a place for people to understand more about the issues we work on, as well as to learn more about the grantees and our partners. It's natural for people to be curious: `Who are you guys? And what do you do?'”

The city gets $22 million cash from the foundation, much of which will be used to pay off the Seattle Center debts. The hope is that the foundation campus will pump new life into the center.

The foundation has sought out the Uptown Alliance and the South Lake Union Friends and Neighbors, among other community groups, for feedback. So far they haven't encountered opposition. Of course, it's early.

This column will be archived and updated, so as demolition (2007) gives way to construction (2008-09) and ribbon cutting (2010), the conversation can keep rolling.

A design review meeting for the project had been scheduled for this past Wednesday, but it was pushed back and is now tentatively set for July 19 at 6:30 at the Queen Anne Community Center. By that time, foundation contractors will be able to present more specific ideas on the design. They will also field questions and comments from the public.


CommentsRSS icon

Say goodbye to reasonably-priced Center parking.

Strikes me as the basic problem is that it is thought of as a "campus" and campuses are intentionally designed to be separate from the city around them.

Why call it a campus?

I am not one to defend the Gates family (although Mary Gates was a wonderful woman. But she's dead) but things could be much worse. This could be the hometown of Wal-Mart or something really terrible like that.

The Gates foundation had done a lot of good stuff, and Melinda (at least) seems to have some taste. And at least they paid for the land.

Loss of parking seems a small price to pay.

Oh christ, does that part of town really need more "iconic" architecture?

i like how a foundation that has done as much as they have gets criticized for displacing a skate park, semantics ("campus"), and aesthetics.

maybe they should stop being successful and needing more room and we can build a skate park and avert an architectural crisis in the hearts and souls of those who spend time around seattle center?

Ugh. I hear you Charles. The Gates Foundation is doing more good in this world we can possibly imagine. We should be fucking honored that it's headquartered in Seattle. Who gives a shit where the money came from or how it was earned, look where it's going and what it's doing! Those people are doing amazing things and are quite literally changing the world for the better and Seattleites are worried about how the fucking building looks?! Are you fucking kidding me? How goddamn petty is this city?

What a shame.

Ryan -

Or it could be that the few shallow airheads that there are here -- read and post via the Stranger.

Strange idea, not at all -- cult like in some ways---

Bill and Melinda are world class in every way and will be remembered in history at the top of the list......long after rock bands and sex advisors.

charles nailed it. this will be a center for huge amount of good works, and the eStranger already starting some low-level sniping about it because it's going to replace an empty swimming pool -- i mean a skate park -- and may not be up to eStranger's architectural standards.

"Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, your new headquarters better blow us away."

Oh please. Get over yourselves.

1. The use of the term "campus" is not "semantics." Read my link.

2. No one is saying that the Gates Foundation shouldn't build. But there is a way to do that is blah and a way to do it that is great.

WELL -- this silly old sorta commie feminist would be just fine with army surplus trailers if it meamt more money for the poor, dying, and social underclass of the world.

Bill and Melinda have elevated giving away your fortune to a whole new level - TALK about class act.

BY the way - if their Media home is any signal, the cozy shack where the worlds most prominent want to eat dinner, if that is any signal - whatever they build will be just fine.

So very glad they decided to stay in Seattle. Big coup for us - and the devine karma from Africa alone should help offset all self indulgent and lightweight crap the Stranger and its quirky staff of whiners puts out.

WELCOME to Seattle-- Bill and Melinda, three cheers and keep giving. Mother Theresa would approve - indeed, perhaps she does.

The Gate's Foundation mission notwithstanding, I think we all agree that something that doesn't look like, say, the King County Administration Building would be nice. I'd hope that they'd even try to go beyond the standard issue Boeing/Microsoft office building.

I just hope this doesn't turn into some dorky Seattle quest for yet another "world class" building. World Class buildings - at least the ones in Seattle, and yes, I'm including the library - tend to disappoint. (At least lowbrows like me with no architectural training) They can't help but disappoint after all the hype that surrounds them, and all the hot air that is spewed about them.

I think something in the spirit of the existing Century 21 - era Seattle Center structures (which were largely simple) would be both a neat look and appropriate, as Bill Gates has talked about how that event influenced him.

But whatever they build is fine with me. I agree that the mission of the foundation is much more important than the structure.

I seems important that SOMEWHERE in this story about whether or not the headquarters deal is worth it to taxpayers is to mention that, thanks to the mayor, Bill Gates got a $72 million piece of land for $22 million. But of course the poor guy needs it...

"...whatever they build is fine with me. I agree that the mission of the foundation is much more important than the structure."

Why do we have such a false dichortomy? Why needs there be a conversationwith an either/or? As if criticizing the design of the design is somehow disrespectful? In fact -- if you read my link, which I hope you do -- the Gates Foundation mission to improve the world will be manifest in its own HQ. I make my suggestion not to denigrate their mission but to help them do something which will show that in every detail they are aware of their impact and strive to do their best. Good urban design is very much linked to issues of sustainability (via public health) which are the Gates focus.

I think it shows lack of respect for the Gates to say "anything you do will be fine." That's BS. The Gates, if it is serious about its mission, will understand that its HQ is at several levels a manifestaion of its mission. It seems a foregobe conclusion to me that it will aim for some level of "green building." And that is great. So why shouldn't we ask the Gates to build in a manner which is urban? And supports a walkable sustainable city?

I, for one, wasn't trying to make it into an either/or question. I just don't care either way.

If the Gates foundation wants to do a (cringe) "world class" building that's fine - and that's their decision to make. But when you get right down to it, the work that they do out in the world is what's important. Their actions speak for them - or they should. There's no need for a vanity building.

If the building they build sets an example or breaks ground in sustainable living, wise engery use, urban planning, etc, but looks like the King County Administration Building (my favorite ugly building example) I would swallow hard and look on the bright side. Seattle has plenty of ugly buildings, what's one more?

As for the value of the land: If Microsoft had been given a sweetheart deal on this land, I would be outraged. But since this is an important charitable foundation with an excellent track record, I think any sweetheart deal is fine. We've certainly done worse - just look at Schell's giveaway of the Pacific Medical Center complex.

With all of that said, I realize that people with a passion for design have different viewpoints, and I respect that.

David - that is not where the food bank will be ..... and you go to parks for picnics .... you are silly.

Reflect theie mission? --- Christ man, this is office space ... an it will look fine.

Most likely great .... and will be green and gold and marble and water and grass and blass ... silly boy,,,,, go do some good with your life and quit worrying about what a future building will look like being built by the RICHEST man on the planet.

Did I miss the consmic implications or Seattle..... the payroll will be great ....and the building will be fine.

Not too fine, Gates is trying to GIVE AWAY money, not do a palace to his ego.

And think of all the out-of-town visitors to the Gates HQ building that will be able to walk over, be endeared by the scary-ass clown at the Funhouse, walk in, get blasted, and break a nose while slamming to a Spits show. Sounds great to me.

Those first few lines were an attempt at irony. The Gates Foundation doesn't really "owe" us anything. But they seem to be interested in building something that will be a credit to the city and to Seattle Center. They've been pretty open about wanting feedback from the public, so if you have an opinion/idea, give it to them. Through this page or at the design review meeting or with letters to the DPD.

I should mention that the archived version of this post will be updated with pictures of new artist renderings as they become available. So check back if you're curious.

Hey - NEW/OLD IDEA -- how about some wonderful towers, three, lots of space and 200 hundred units on top - subisided for lower/middle income forever?

Walk the talk. Mixed use at its finest. Internationsl model project. Award winning. Good PR for Gates folks and city. Innovative. Tres urban.

Model idea in a city that wants housing density and the land was a chap buy from the city.

Pass it on. Get out of the box Gates.

Help keep the middle class in inner Seattle and all the offices you want as well.

Wish the library had done the same with all its new buildings. Missed a real chancde due to ego amouck.

Mixred uses -Oh no. Rather build monuments to giant ego LIBRARY BOARD -and small twon Debra - ego. No new housing at all - all on taxpayer money and city owned land gone forever for much needed mixed use.

Maybe they could build it around the skate park?

The Seattle Public library is the most important building in the world. It put Seattle on the map. It looks like an airport inside because it's a place for thoughts to take flight.

But it doesn't have a Starbucks or a sports bar!!!

Koolhaas's SPL is awful. Here's a quick test of its awfulness: stand at any point in the main floor, the one with the "mixing area". Look around and pick a point at least twenty yards away. Try to walk there.

Good luck.

incest father and daughter with mother and son!

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).