Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« McGavick: Processing the War | The Old QFC Building on Broadw... »

Friday, June 16, 2006

Anti-Prostitution Hysteria

Posted by on June 16 at 18:49 PM

Why is it that people who call themselves journalists instantly toss every shred of objectivity overboard when it comes to the issue of sex work? In today’s PI, guest columnist Bonnie Erbe purports to be talking about sex workers in Germany for the World Cup. But in fact, she’ s not actually reporting news, she’s just leaping from one unsubstantiated assumption to the next and frothing at the mouth as she does so.

I’ll make the standard disclaimer here: No one should be forced to do sex work, and it should be adults-only, no kids. However, Ms. Erbe doesn’t make any distinction between adult women and children, and independent businesswomen and rape victims. This line, in particular, is classic: “Whether women enter the sex trade willingly or not, no government should sanction prostitution.”
Because the government knows what’s best for you, ladies. You don’t need to worry your pretty little head about what you think is okay, other people will make your personal choices for you.

And this: “By its very nature, prostitution is demeaning to women and encourages anti-social, some would say depraved, behavior by men.”
It enrages me that people who don’t know anything about sex work toss off lines like this as if it had been handed to them on a stone tablet instead of on a press release from anti-sex-workers activist group. Guess what, Bonnie, you don’t get to define my experience. I’m a sex worker, I’ve had sex for money, and I didn’t feel demeaned by it. My clients are actually very ordinary men with jobs and mortgages and the whole American Dream thing going on, and I bet if I did a line-up, you’d be utterly unable to distinguish guys who were my clients from guys who weren’t.
So you can take your demeaning and depraved soundbites and stuff them. That would be doing us sex workers a major-league favor.



CommentsRSS icon

MM: Contact the PI and ask to do a counter-editorial. Getting a guest editorial in the local papers isn't that hard.

That's an excellent idea

My sister and I have this same arguement about strippers and porn. She is of the opinion that ALL strippers and porn actresses are forced into by abusive boyfriends and husbands, and are on drugs.

I know that this is true in some cases, and I think that's criminal. However, I have known a lot of strippers and porn actors (both male and female) who have it very much together, don't do drugs, and no abusive boyfriend/husband in sight. They just have nice bodies and/or like sex and like to make money while doing it.

Of course, whenever we dicuss this, I'm cast as some kind of pervert, but she's an ass-aching puritan, so it all balances out.

I'm glad somebody said something...I threw my paper away in disgust when I read the piece.

You should do an editorial. It's easy (and I can't imagine them not printing it because it's about sex and sex sells.)


Then again, I've never seen an editorial by a sex worker in the paper. It might be a first. Go for it!

Bonnie, you ignorant slut.

I don't know what you're all complaining about. I think she makes a great point: if you make it illegal, it'll just go away.

At least I think that's how it works.

I about blew a gasket when I read that article, myself. Pisses me off when people equate illegal, drug-addled streetwalkers with LEGAL, consensual sex work.

WTF is the difference between sex work and any other work? You're exchanging your time and skills for money. If your skills happen to include sex, more power to ya - it's NO ONE ELSE's business what an adult does with their own body.

This society has the most truly fucked-up attitudes about sex...we're obsessed with it, freaked out by it, terrified of it, adore it, fear it, guiltily seek it out, run away from it...we're freaks.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).