Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Drinking Liberally | Shocker: Sharkansky Makes an E... »

Tuesday, May 9, 2006

The Culture of Life

Posted by on May 9 at 15:47 PM

babybush.jpg

From CBS/AP:

U.S. Ranks Low On Newborn Survival

Report Finds One Of Highest Infant Death Rates Among Developed Nations

America may be the world’s superpower, but its survival rate for newborn babies ranks near the bottom among developed nations.

Among 33 industrialized nations examined in a new report, the United States tied with Hungary, Malta, Poland and Slovakia with a death rate of nearly 5 per 1,000 babies. Only Latvia had higher mortality figures, with 6 per 1,000, according to the report by the U.S.-based Save the Children.

As SusanG over at Daily Kos says:

I’m waiting for the Christianist conservative right to ramp up a coordinated, astroturfing, indignant, fear-mongering, self-righteous campaign on behalf of infants in response to the release of yesterday’s report from Save the Children indicating that the U.S. is failing to protect very-recent-embryos - newborns to the rest of us - from dying.

Somehow I sense this issue will not get the traction the overheated fetus debate gets with the fundamentalist crowd. There’s just something not quite as alluring about discussing health care provisions for pregnant moms and their offspring compared with telling your neighbor what to do with her womb.


CommentsRSS icon

Love the camouflage on the kid. This photo should have the caption, "Nooooo, please don't send me to Iraq!!!!!!"

i'm sure clinton's failure to pass real health-care reform and his capitulation to the right by pushing a rollback of welfare has nothing to do with it. all the republicans' fault, right?

Uh... the failure of passing Health Care reform is on the guy who sponsored? How about the Republicans who, I don't know, blocked it? Thats like saying "Clinton was asking to have it blocked, he shouldn't have been wearing such alluring reform". 6 years since Clinton, those children already been left behind.

The Clenis rule applies:

First Republican to mention Clinton on a blog has tacitly admitted they cannot actually debate the issue at hand. It's the same tactic as calling someone a Nazi; the first person to use it automatically loses the argument.

WF sounds like a disgruntled liberal to me. I'm also disgruntled, but my main beef with Clinton is that he pushed welfare reform without compensating for its loss with increased health care coverage, day care, and education aid for the poor.

But but But but But but But but But but But but But but But but But but But but But but But but But but But but But but But but But but But but But but But but But

CLINTON!

Next to landing a fish in his stocked pond, the best part of Bush's presidency is when he gets to hold up a crying baby whose father or mother was a U.S. soldier killed in Iraq.

Yes, I like that rule. It's an oldie but goodie...I was on a BB ten years ago where we all agreed that the person who mentioned Hitler kick him/herself out of the thread. Same dif.

You're all a bunch of Clinton-loving Hitler-heads who hate America.

So there.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).