Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« The Great Greats | 100 Percent Beef »

Friday, May 26, 2006

Saving Strauss

Posted by on May 26 at 14:12 PM

To label criticism of Leo Strauss and his influence on modern American politics as anti-Semitic, which Adam Kirsch does in this sad article, is simply bizarre. Strauss may have been a central figure but many (or most) of the people who follow his ideas or influenced them are not Jewish (Plato, Hegel, Kojeve, Fukuyama). There’s simply no way to salvage a thinker whose favorite TV show was Gun Smoke.

From the article:

The anti-Semitism behind the current wave of Strauss hatred, like the anti-Semitism that drives so much talk about the neoconservative “cabal” in Washington, is barely even veiled. There is no mistaking the insolent glee with which some of his critics (or, better, his slanderers) associate Strauss, a refugee from Nazi Germany, with the greatest enemies of the Jews. Tim Robbins, in his recent play “Embedded,” portrays characters based on Messrs. Wolfowitz and Perle shouting “Hail Leo Strauss,” in an echo of the Nazi salute. Last year, a BBC documentary called “The Power of Nightmares” compared Strauss to Sayyid Qutb, the ideological godfather of Hamas.

This comparison, made in Power of Nightmares—which screens on June 9th and 10th at SIFF, and must not be missed (it is the best documentary I’ve seen since Roger and Me)—is convincing. The director, Adam Curtis, doesn’t even hint at Strauss being tied to some shadowy Israeli agenda. His Jewish origin is not brought up once. Strauss’s ideas are not Jewish ideas, they are simply bad ideas, whether they come from the Republic or the more rigid sections of Philosophy of Right.


CommentsRSS icon

Well it is always easier to play the bigot card than to formulate an actual argument against your detractors.

Comparing Strauss to Nazis is rash, but it's not anti-semetic-it's a fair comparison of two similar ideologies.

What a tard.

Actually, Charles, Strauss's political concerns are, at root, about what they used to call "the Jewish question"—the question of minority protections. His terror of totalitarianism and of mob rule were, at root, a terror of the abuse of minorities by a majority.

Which is why the critics who accuse Strauss of being a philosopher of totalitarianism and fascism sounds like such histrionic rubes.

Ditto. And Strauss is a very jewish thinker. His style of reading, which is the main thing uniting the Straussians -- not neo-conservatism, as most assume -- comes from reading the Kabbalah. His most important statements on hermeneutics are in his essay on Maimonides, Persecution and the Art of Writing. His most famous student, Allan Bloom, was jewish, and while there are plenty of Straussians like Fukuyama, I'd be willing to bet the majority are jewish.

I'd like to hear why you actually think his ideas are bad.

I highly recommend Adam Curtis' films, both the Power of Nightmares and Century of the Self. Anyone who can't make the screening should watch these online. Archive.org has them available for free download and the full resolution version is available on bittorrent. Download it, watch it, and burn a copy for friends.

download The Power of Nighmares here

If you think Strauss's thinking is incompatible with the worship of authoritarian rule, then you should check out this very readable book:

Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire
http://yalepress.yale.edu/yupbooks/book.asp?isbn=0300109733

His terror of totalitarianism and of mob rule were, at root, a terror of the abuse of minorities by a majority.

Which is why the critics who accuse Strauss of being a philosopher of totalitarianism and fascism sounds like such histrionic rubes.

Hmm, not so sure of that. A genuine or manufactured fear of being oppressed seems to be the cornerstone of almost all neo-fascist rhetoric.

Cool page
with html

{links} - nice site!

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).