Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Your Computer Looks Thirsty | Bulge In »

Saturday, May 27, 2006

Holy… Shit… Harper’s… Oh… My… God…

Posted by on May 27 at 14:10 PM

If you haven’t already read the June issue of Harper’s—yes, Harper’s—you might want to rush out and get one before the whole staff is shipped off to Gitmo or their offices are firebombed.

This month’s Notebook column, “On Simple Human Decency,” by Harper’s literary editor Ben Metcalf, is… stunning. Brave. Nuts. Anyone who thought the anti-Bush rhetoric would cool once Lewis Lapham stepped as Editor down has another think coming…

Am I allowed to write that I would like to hunt down George W. Bush, the President of the United States, and kill him with my bare hands?

Let me be clear that I have no wish to perform such a deed in fact…. I seek only to gauge what level of discourse is still acceptable in this country by asking, in the hope that I might someday participate in that discourse, whether I am free to posit that it would probably be great fun, and a boon to all mankind, if i were to slaughter the president of the United States with my bare hands?

….In place of the initial question I might ask instead, “Am I allowed to write that I would like to kidnap George W. Bush and fly him to a prison in some faraway land where his ‘rights’ are no longer an issue, there to put a bag over his head and making him stand for hours on one leg while I defecate on his New Testament before chaining his arms to the ceiling until he dies of a heart attack, after which I will claim that he never existed?”

It’s not just idle, sensationalistic threats—Metcalf’s essay has a point, but I’m not going to reproduce his despairing nut graph here. Go buy the mag. And I can’t link to the essay, unfortunately because it isn’t up on the website yet—hell, I’m surprised that their website is still up at all. So if you want to read this… this… freaking brilliant, terrifying, breathtaking piece (and you do want to read this piece), then you’ll just have to march your butt down to Bulldog or Steve’s Broadway News or the newstand in the Pike Place Market and buy a copy of Harper’s.

And just in case Metcalf’s take-no-prisoners-but-one essay, which kicks off the issue, wasn’t shit-kicking enough, the issue includes an essay by Art Spiegelman on the Danish Mohammed cartoons—and unlike the issue of Harper’s in which Lapham condemned the cowardly American media for not showing the cartoons, this issue of Harper’s shows them all—each and every one. Twice. It also includes Spiegelman’s entry for Iran’s deny-the-Holocaust cartoon contest. (Both of Spiegelman’s parents survived Auschwitz, and he won the Pulitzer Prize for Maus, a comic novel about his father’s experiences during the Second World War.) Spiegelman’s Holocaust-denial comic is… it unnerves me to say… grimly hilarious.


CommentsRSS icon

If someone can print bad things like that about our president then there's no way the press is censored everyone, no need to worry about that...


And if you want to vote out Bush to really show those S.O.B. Republican's who's in charge then stand up and vote him out!


We have jobs waiting for all of the Bush administration at Halliburton and they'll make ten times what they made in government. So go ahead and vote out whoever you like!


Now everyone put on your liberal slogan t-shirts and repeat after me...George W. eats his own potty and he's a bad person who picks his boogers!...he eats his own boogers!


That's right let it all out. Just as long as you keep driving your SUVs to the corporate store to buy magazines printed on dead trees...you can say whatever you like!


Isn't free speech a gift?

Damn, you beat me too this one, Savage--it's all I've been reading this afternoon.

Ariel Sharon will awake for his coma only to watch as we defecate on his precious Torah, while in the next room the President...

Good to hear that Harper's has apparently survived Lapham.

what an easy grab at "character" and "integrity" and "bravery".

the editorial reads like a nerd's highschool lunchroom claim talking shit about the bully football player.

what happens when the bully swings at him?

will he fight, or take it back after a bloody nose

im just sayin.

I've got my liberal slogan T-shirt on and I just want to say that...George W. has a turd burger for breakfast with snot sauce, and he eats farts for lunch...and for dinner...


We're really making a difference now...oh by the way does anyone have room in their Hybrid SUV to give me a ride to the Portland Team Dresch show? My friends live in a Pearl condo an we can all stay there. They're queer vegans and were interns on the Al Gore global warming movie.

Christ, where have you guys been? This issue has been out for like, 2 weeks already.

As for the Notebook article, I have mixed feelings. First off, this is a distinct break from the measured, reasonable outrage expressed every month by Lapham, toward a much more provocative, sensationalist tone. Part of the brilliance of this article is its very sensationalism - how many readers are going to be able to see past the sensationalism of the article to grasp the underlying point about public dialog? It's quite clever, really - sure, it's satifying to masturbate to the thought of killing GWB with your bare hands. But it's like erotic art - there's a tension between the erotic aspect/arousal and the pure aesthetic experience which is more cerebral and seeks to distance itself from the corporeal. And he's getting at something like that in this article, illustrating through sensationalism the current sensationalist tenor of the public debate and our inability to see past it.

And I think the writer is aware of that, but I miss Lapham's trope of "they are the true radicals, and we are sensible ones", and how it served to ground the magazine in reality, fitting with Harper's 150-year tradition from the days of Mark Twain et al. This new article is a little too postmoderny for that tradition.

postmodernism never did anybody good.

our heroes fail. and continue to fail.

perhaps i need new heroes...?

Dan,
it looks like Harper's has been hitting the mark for you recently.

I noticed how silent you and The Stranger were to Celia Farber's article "Out of Control" that was right there on the cover of the "impeach Bush" issue. Cat seems to have gotten your tongue over that one. I suppose there were no "Dr. Dickheads" for you to scream at.

You're eventually going to have to admit you've fucked up when it comes to "AIDS". It's not too late, Dan...there's still time for you to put your critical thinker's cap on and go behind the scenes of AIDS science and ask some hard questions of our noble researchers and scientists. Or maybe you could begin by just reading that article in Harper's. You could do the world some good at this point. Game?

Hey Dan how about a liberal slogan t-shirt that reads:


This shirt does not say
George W. eats turds with booger sauce?


That would really show them how clever us post modern liberals are right? BTW - I majored in Fouccault studies at Champagne Urbana!

how exactly did this become a referendum on foucault or postmodernism?

stupid, stupid anti-intellectuals...

Re:Post Modernism, read the Harper's article and deconstruct using undergrad post mod techniques. It's a laugh riot then.

i posted two links, but the damned spam filter caught it. So here is the pdf of the actual article again:
http://jimbomonkeyface.googlepages.com/BenMetcalfOnSimpleHumanDecency.pdf

Just as worthy a read is had by Kevin Baker's essay, "Stabbed in the Back! - The past and future of a right-wing myth"

About fear and the great need for greater powers to have great enemies...

I've been reading Harper's blog lately. Looks like I'm going to have to throw down for the magazine, now. Thanks for the tip, Dan!

(note, not the same person on here who writes under the pseudonym BD who appears to be a catty troll)

No reason not to subscribe - it's only about $25 for two years. I don't see why anyone would need to get it at the newsstand for that price.

POST MODERN FUN wrote:
"BTW - I majored in Fouccault studies at Champagne Urbana!"

COMMENT:
Wow to go, Einstein. Did your grad thesis win any awards for misspelling Foucault?

Cool sighting on the typo! Perfect spellers are awesome, and I love the way they use minor typos to ignore what was said! Could you help me with the correct spelling of these sentences:


"She BIN had dat han'-made dress"


"Befo' you know it, he be done aced de tesses."


"Ah 'on know what homey be doin."


"Can't nobody tink de way he do."


"I ast Ruf could she bring it ovah to Tom crib."


What is the correct spelling in white American english? People who don't spell like us need to be shown how stupid they are.

The criminalization of deviant spellers is another form of cultural domination. One way to identify the oppressor is by their focus on the implied meaning of words and the power structures that are accepted as part of the way words are used and spelled.


Deviant play then involves invoking words in a manner which undermines their authority, by mocking their assumptions, style, or spelling. These layers of misdirection as to the intention of the author create discourses of expanding deviant identities.

I am anal-retentive about spelling. My idea of a fun afternoon is to visit chat rooms and blogs and correct other people's English. I'm the type of person who notices typos in restaurant menu's and it ruins my meal.

Knock it off you guys. It just so happens that I was a speling major in college.

I have to admit--I did cringe somewhat when SCB typed "menu's".

Todays Special always gets me. Also I hate to see "Crustini" printed in a menu. But "Theater"...that makes my butt clinch.

It's easy -- pick the way you're going to write something, then spell everything right. Come, you know, correct.

It's not THE WAY you write. Misspelling is an indicator that a) you don't know how to spell what you're writing, b) you're lazy/in a hurry, c) you're beyond your vocabulary.

Do your thing. Do watcha wannadoo. But, misspelling the douche you majored in offers nothing but a post-graduate hazing.

Cool page
with html

{links} - nice site!

Buy soma online right now!
Buy soma online
http://buy-soma-online.to.pl
buy-soma-online.to.pl
[url="buy-soma-online.to.pl"]Buy soma online[/url]

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).