Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Speaking of the Packed ACLU Ev... | Was Sugar Sweet? »

Saturday, May 6, 2006

AP on Burner vs. Reichert

Posted by on May 6 at 8:47 AM

The dean of Washington State’s political press corps, David Ammons, today offers this long report on our state’s hottest Congressional race:

OLYMPIA, Wash. — Washington already has a heavily Democratic congressional delegation, but hungry national Democrats are hoping to pick up at least one more House seat here.

They’re taking on The Sheriff, freshman Rep. Dave Reichert, in the increasingly independent 8th District east of Seattle. As President Bush’s poll ratings fall, Democrats say Reichert could be the most visible victim in Washington this year.

Ammons notes the “substantial buzz in the district and on liberal blogs” for Darcy Burner, Reichert’s Democratic challenger, and writes that if there’s a national pro-Democrat surge this fall, and if that surge is powerful enough to flip some swing districts into Democratic hands, “the textbook case could be the 8th.”

Republicans, of course, are downplaying that possibility:

“I predict we won’t see this sweep nationally … and that few districts are actually in play,” says state GOP Chairwoman Diane Tebelius.

Sure, people are unhappy and we realize it will be a tough year for the Republicans,” but strong candidates should trump that, she says.

Her prediction: All three GOP incumbents are returned to office and the GOP has a good shot at taking out Democratic Rep. Rick Larsen in the 2nd District.

And what do the political analysts say?

At the moment, independent analysts don’t see either the 8th or 2nd flipping, but say the possibility is strong enough to place on their watch lists.

The Cook Political Report says the 8th should lean to Reichert and that Larsen is likely to win a new term. Congressional Quarterly likewise says both are favored. The Rothenberg Political Report has the closest prognosis for the 8th, calling it a toss-up, tilted Republican.

The big unknown, of course, is the strength of any Democratic tide. Analyst Charlie Cook says the current trend is “clear enough to make any Republican candidate or consultant reach for an airsickness bag,” with Democrats in their strongest position since 1992.


CommentsRSS icon

Nice plumb picking Eli. How often does the Stranger chearleading squad meet to practice for Burner? Do you have your practices in her campaign office?

Practices? There are practices? And we weren't invited?

Don't worry, Patrick. Reality has a well-known liberal bias.

I am oping Burner wins but not sure it can happen with a message.

What's the dems message that's going to sweep the into power this year? Anyone? Is it still "vote Dem, we're not Bush"?

According to Eli, it's "stand for the military" but don't stand for "the military" wink, wink. What were you trying to say in your article titled "Democratic Quagmire"? Because to me it sounded like you were telling Democrats to tone down their anti-war rhetoric, just your candidate can get elected. Sounds like something Joel Connelly would say...

Gloat about Cantwell being "in trouble" all you want, Patrick, but it was dumbshits like you that cheerleaded the Republicans(Bush et al) who got us into this quagmire in the first place.

Hardly anyone in the Republican party will take responsibility for their actions and you don't strike me as the sort that will start doing it for them.

LOL Patrick. "GIMME A D! GIMME AN A!..."

This article states nothing we didn't already know.

Burner, Wright and Goldmark, it's time to sweep out the corrupt trash.

Pelosi said this am on Face the Nation - she will call for cutting interest on student loans in half at once - plus some better attempts at a balanced budget ... at the moment letting the R;s squirm is not a bad tactic. Predictions from even the right wing that five or six more corrupters in Congress are heading for prison - and now buying whores on top of all the rest --- my, my, my. How did I miss that concept all mixed in with abstinance.

Patick, go back to South Dakota. And wonder why the state is in such poor shape.

Go Darcy, sending another 100.00 in June.

You all will vote for her just because she's cute.

A warm bucket of spit would be preferable to Rubber Stamp Reichert.

Thankfully, Burner is the real deal and it will be a pleasure to vote FOR her while at the same time voting AGAINST the neocons and their enablers.

Above - Very sorry, but ....

Fags do not vote for woment becaue they are cute --- it is their politics, and because Lesbian friends would kick us us in the butt if we dont't.

By the way, Bruner is very cool to my Lesbian friends.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).