Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Reichert's (7:30 am!) Campaign... | Stranger Restaurant Listings: ... »

Tuesday, April 18, 2006

What the Holy Hell—Dave Reichert’s kickoff campaign

Posted by on April 18 at 14:38 PM

I got myself up at the butt crack of dawn this morning (5:50 am) to prepare for Congressman Dave Reichert’s official campaign kickoff at the Meydenbauer Center in Bellevue with Eli Sanders. I’ve never been to a campaign kickoff or seen Reichert speak, so I thought it would be a perfect opportunity to catch a few words from the Republican incumbent defending his seat from tenacious newbie Darcy Burner.

When Eli proposed our date (romantics, take note) I had trouble imagining what sort of people would be down to party on a Tuesday morning. Would there even be a crowd? I mean, 7:30 am doesn’t scream “FUN!” like an evening of body shots or limbo races, but maybe I just don’t know how to party.

When we arrived outside the Bellevue center, handfuls of men and women were scattered around the block to protest Reichert’s kickoff. Some were wearing nifty T-shirts, like this one:
Protester1.jpg
There was one lonely (but very handsome) Republican man with a suit and sign outside, who would not allow us to take his picture. In fact, he snapped like a rabid dog when we tried. Inside, more suited men and women were seated nine to a table at about 90 tables in the room. They were happily eating eggs, parsley, potatoes, bacon, and sausage. The crowd was plump but there was not a body shot in site.

As people ate, men and women in suits flattered Reichert onstage. It might have been the early hour but the opening speeches were generic and lackluster, “Dave Reichert is a strong Congressman who has met and exceeded his campaign promises…he knows how to lead…” until King County Prosecutor Norman Maleng stepped up to the podium. As a highly influential and assumedly well-respected prosecutor, I expected great things from him. This is what I got: “Did you know that the president still refers to Reichert as `Sheriff’?” That was it. That was his story. It didn’t end with a heroic account of when Reichert was sheriff, Maleng just kinda trailed off after that. I kept waiting for something else. Does The Sheriff call the prez `Tex’? Was Maleng going to break into a little free rap/theme song to get the crowd pumped?

Uhh..
Wicki-wild wild
Wicki-wicki-wild
Wicki-wild
Wicki-wicki Wild Wild West
Jim West, desperado
Rough rider, no you don’t want nada
None of this, six-gunnin this, brother runnin this
Buffalo soldier, look it’s like I told ya
Any damsel that’s in distress
be outta that dress when she meet Jim West
Rough neck so go check the law and abide…

“Welcome to the Reichllenium, (bitches),” he could have said to the thunderous applause of all (or at least me). Alas, he did not. That story went nowhere, which became the trademark of the morning.

Team Reichert presents: Stories that go nowhere.

When Reichert took the stage, I wanted him to launch into what he stands for, what his party stands for, what he hopes to accomplish, etc. I wanted meat. I wanted to be able to size him up. Instead, this is what I got:
“President Bush’s tax cuts are working… Change is tough…Dreams are still happening. I read Dr. Seuss the other day….” Which flourished into a story about a little boy Reichert spoke with who wishes to grow up and be a paper cup stacker, and how he, Reichert, wants to help create a nation where this little boy can follow his dreams and stack cups for a living. People in the audience were nodding their heads as if they, too, wanted to help poor children learn to stack cups. Like their plates of soggy eggs, the crowd appeared to be lapping Reichert’s bizarre ranting up.

Reichert also spoke of having a recent man-to-man chat with Cheney to dispel rumors that he was avoiding the VP because of his low approval ratings, “and then [Cheney] offered to campaign for my opponent!” The audience guffawed. I winced. When is joking about your colleague’s low approval ratings good campaign kickoff humor? God, did I need a body shot. Instead, I was forced to start scanning the crowd in search of one person whom I would mate with and then eat, if I had to mate with and then eat anyone in the room.

However, not even my lighthearted fantasies could block Reichert’s freakish speech out. Unless I heard incorrectly, he next launched into a story about how his grandson was born a meth-baby, and that this child weighed two pounds and had burning bowel movements at birth. Meanwhile, people bravely continued eating their bacon and eggs.

“Is this a man who should be representing anyone?” I wondered. I couldn’t even imagine laying eggs in his chest cavity, let alone voting for him. Continuing with his theme of child hood horrors, Reichert then talked about his godson, who was diagnosed with cancer at the age of one and was still fighting it at age 11. He even did an impression of the suffering (and assumedly very sick) child rasping, “I love you.” And still the masses ate and nodded.

I couldn’t find any sort of campaign promise or even a point buried in Reichert’s 13 minute, uh, kickoff. Sad anecdotes, yes. Heart wrenchingly sad. But nothing to reinforce his image as an able Congressman, or even as a noble sheriff, as I suppose Melang’s feeble reference to the president attempted to do.

Reichert finished his speech by announcing that he was the only Republican congressman in western Washington or Oregon, and that it made him feel “lonely.” With that odd wrap up, he left the stage to the tune of Hail to the Chief. As the masses cleared out of the room, Normal Maleng reclaimed the microphone to tell the crowd, “God Bless you, Real Good.”

In summation, I am not making this shit up. It was really fucking weird.


CommentsRSS icon

Surreal.

Was this an attempt to discourage further dates with Eli? I know *I'd* be worried. . .

Did you at least get the non-plumb handsome republican's e-mail (or gay.com screen-name)?

"God Bless You, Real Good"

new Reichert campaign slogan?

"In summation, I am not making this shit up. It was really fucking weird ..."

Just like you, Cienna Sweetheart, chest eggs, hairy thorax, segmented abdomen, & all.

"Like their plates of soggy eggs, the crowd appeared to be lapping Reichert’s bizarre ranting up."

Their plates of eggs were lapping up his ranting???? Now that's bizarre.

Levislade, you would not believe the *wonders* that I saw...

I do not doubt it. Brilliant post, by the way. I don't often "ell oh ell," as they say, while reading things on the Internet, but you had me at "wild wild west."

My concern, as always, is that we democrats do this over and over again; rather than understanding why we lost to a certain candidate, understanding their appeal to voters, we create stories and anecdotes about how truly bizarre they are, and how unlikely it is that anyone, anywhere, will vote for them. Then, we campaign as though this is a slam dunk of an exercise, and scratch our heads when we lose.

There are reasons why Reichert won 2 years ago, and unless and until we can present something that changes that dynamic (and it ain't the war in Iraq which was going on 2 years ago as well), he'll likely win again.

If we ever find Mr. Reichert's torso with its head chewed off and chest cavity full of eggs, we'll be in touch, ma'am.

Stranger senior staff is setting poor Cienna up --- it would seem she has never been to R. events in her pre life in Idaho....they define the word strange.

By comparison this this seems like an every day political pep rally for true believers / donors / volunteers.

Or was the Aryan Nation there flanked by a bevy of Mormon Bishops and spud farmers and fertilizer vendors?

There are reasons why Reichert won 2 years ago, and unless and until we can present something that changes that dynamic (and it ain't the war in Iraq which was going on 2 years ago as well), he'll likely win again.

One of those reasons was a candidate who refused to go negative or even be remotely aggressive against Reichert. Somehow, I doubt Darcy will make the same mistake.

Timothy speaks truth.

My concern, as always, is that we democrats do this over and over again; rather than understanding why we lost to a certain candidate, understanding their appeal to voters, we create stories and anecdotes about how truly bizarre they are, and how unlikely it is that anyone, anywhere, will vote for them. Then, we campaign as though this is a slam dunk of an exercise, and scratch our heads when we lose.

These aren't space aliens we're talking about, they aren't even Kansans. They're eastsiders. If you have to put on the empatho-hat to deal with those strange creatures across the lake, may Jesus Christ help you. (Reader's note: Jesus Christ is our eastside republican analogue to your "Mother Goddess")

Reichert won because he faced off against a loudmouth talk show host who couldn't campaign to save his fat fucking life.

There are reasons why Reichert won 2 years ago, and unless and until we can present something that changes that dynamic (and it ain't the war in Iraq which was going on 2 years ago as well), he'll likely win again.

I have an idea: don't run Dave fucking Ross. And it seems the democrats are way ahead of me. Dave Reichert is going to lose, lose, lose, because he's way to the right of his district, and every day Dave follows the republican party one more step off the deep end he only dims his political future more.

Give me a break people, if you've been to one campaign kickoff you've been to them all.

Cienna- your crappy reporting of Reichert's event today is to be expected. I'm sure you were probably discouraged by the lack of foul-mouthed language, and because people weren't all holding hands and chanting burn-Bush-burn-Bush-burn...

Come on--we all know you're a fraud! You openly parade around your political beliefs in The Stranger--tirelessly plugging Burner at every chance.

How do you have the gall to show up at a Reichert fundraiser and pretend to be an "independent observer"?!?

Patrick, you dishonest shit, at what point did the author claim to be an "independant observer?" (your quotes)

yeah well, screw the independent observation...that's what gives us headlines saying "Bush Denies..." instead of "Bush Repeats Lies..."

Guys like Patrick crack me up. They come to the Stranger Slog and accuse the Stranger reporters of not being "independent observers" as if that is going to hurt their feelings. Patrick its the black glove sex and rap/grunge rag, dude! The real question is did she falsify her observations or just Cherry pick?

Now if you said, "you bastards lie like the Washington Post!" you might get a rise out of someone here.

P.S. I have never heard Reichert say any thing of substance. I mean this literally. I'm sure he has and I've missed it but he does seem to prefer bullshit and sugar coating with nothing being coated.

Cienna,

I've never been to a campaign kick-off, either, and I'd like to hear more about this one. Were there other reporters in the bleachers with you and Eli? Can you point us to any other reporting of the event that has been published?

Phil - scant mention in real news media because there is no news.

Just a set up event for supporters. Nothing special, interesting or newsworthy.

There is no reason any sane person would go to one even if they support the candidate. Send a check - blow off the event. Very boring stuff.

Cienna is scraping to tell us the speaches were not quality, of course not, the people were silly, of course, and everyone needed another cup of coffee. The slog is about Cienna, reality slog.......

Big news HERE. Richert will be hard to beat. The newbie nobody from no where will have a problem impressing the Eastside. She impresses the Seattle rads and that might work in Richerts favor. The Eastside of today does not look to Seattle for much.

And our wacked out theories of their lives makes them crack up.

And smug juvenile mockery from afar - way afar - is not substitute for a real campaign. Jim Mcdermott would not win on the Eastside..... Darcy needs
to get very smart...... and even then, all uphill.

BobNo3 raises an interesting point. Are Democrats wrong in their assumption that voters want an "independent" candidate? Did the voters who put in Reichert trust and expect that he would follow the directions of an informed and effective national leadership? Would voters rather have a representative who is "with the program" and can get goodies in exchange, or an unpredictable do gooder who might go her own way? What Cienna reports of Reicherts speach didn't do to bad at speaking to the former.

SPEECH. It's SPEECH. Christ on a pogo stick, how do you expect anyone to take you guys seriously?

Had a parent tell me this morning that her middle school son said one of his teachers takes off so much credit for spelling and handwriting errors that he figured out he gets a significanlty better grade by writing as little as possible, regardless of content.

No it is not Christ on a Pogo Stick, it is Carl Rove in hippy drag fleeing the White House.

I run spell check on my term papers.

OK?

If Reichert's so lonely, then voters in the 8th should send him home.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).