Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Cocks Are Funny | The Benefits of Working Near E... »

Monday, April 3, 2006

The New New York Times Website

Posted by on April 3 at 11:29 AM

Check out the New York Times’s new hairdo. It’s easy to complain about redesigns, but, uh, was something wrong with the old website? Why’d you have to go changing on us, nytimes.com? I suppose the cramped, thin, low-impact fonts make room for more headlines on the front page, which, from a news-conveying standpoint, is good, and according to this note from the website editor there are other enhancing features built into the thing. But the impression it leaves is of frailty.

Don’t miss the story in today’s Times about “Helen Vendler, arguably the country’s most prominent poetry critic” taking on “Alice Quinn of The New Yorker, arguably the country’s most prominent poetry editor” over Quinn’s new collection of dead poet Elizabeth Bishop’s unpublished fragments, drafts, etc. Vendler says publishing this book is “reprehensible.” Quinn, who says she anticipated this attack from Vendler, will be in Seattle promoting the book on April 27 at Richard Hugo House.


CommentsRSS icon

Why do they hate us Boomers so? Using small print like that hurts my eyes. If I stare at it too long I won't be able to skateboard over to the UW for my seminars.

The print's not that small; it's just cramped and curlicued and blotchy and ugly and hard to read. It's Georgia. It's awful. It has the weird quality of looking like every paragraph is in a minutely different point size even when it's not. And it looks nothing like the New York Times, which is one of the most recognizable graphical layouts in the world, instantly recognizable to every literate person even if you cut off the banner. This just looks like shit.

I'm rather bummed on the new NYT layout - I miss the giant banner ads that took up 2/3rds of your screen and continual pop-up adverts the old site featured!

At least the sidebar fonts are now sized larger than 5 points. The old site must have been designed somewhere around 1996. It's about time they updated it.

Yup. Looks like crap. But then that's what you get when the Publisher has the rationality of a fourteen year old boy who's just discovered porn (read the article inthe NYer from a few months ago about Sulzberger's limitations -- it explains a hell of a lot):

Hormone induced lurching from one nutty decision to the next -- from Jodi Wilgoren (John Kerry looks like a "caged hamster") to Adam Nagourney, to Judith Miller to the introduction of "web select" (and the resulting disappearance of free web access to Paul Krugman (and mercifully some of the other columnists, but that's just an indvertant benefit)) and now to this.

Honestly, the time has come for the Stranger to challenge the grey lady as this nation's paper of record. Come on, Dan. Step up to the plate!

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).