Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Welcome Home, Speaker Speaker! | Rove Indictment Coming? »

Friday, April 21, 2006

The Most Exciting Quote Since 1992

Posted by on April 21 at 12:27 PM

Joel Connelly, whose obsession with the Stranger continues unabated (still more here) loves Bill Clinton almost as much as the Stranger loves Nick Licata. Connelly spent some time in the then-candidate’s limo in 1992, and he’s been milking the anecdote ever since.

Check out the following series of excerpts from Connelly’s column over the last 14 years

February 29, 1992

Earlier in the day, Clinton was in high spirits as he drove back to Boeing Field. He had just used a bullhorn to address about 600 people who weren’t able to jam into the Edgewater. “I might move out here,” he joked.

March 8, 1993

As Bill Clinton’s limousine drove onto the tarmac at Boeing Field last spring, seeming to head straight toward a gleaming Mount Rainier, he mused, “I think I’ll move out here sometime.” A year later, it almost seems like he’s keeping the promise. Clinton is due back in the Northwest April 3-4 to meet in Vancouver, B.C., with Russian President Boris Yeltsin.

November 18, 1993

Mount Rainier appeared to rise directly out of the end of Boeing Field last year as President Clinton’s limousine drove onto the tarmac after a campaign visit. “I think I’ll move out here sometime,” joked Clinton, buoyed by good crowds and a beautiful late winter day. He seems to be making good on his promise.

November 5, 1994

Clinton has been greeted by sunny skies on six visits since the summer of 1991. “I think I’ll move out here sometime,” he said during a 1992 trip while driving onto the tarmac at Boeing Field with Mount Rainier seeming to loom up at the end of the runway.

February 8, 1996

Clinton has developed an affection for the region. In 1991, just before launching his campaign for president, the future president, his wife and daughter spent a few days in British Columbia. In his 1992 campaign, heading down a runway at Boeing Field with Mount Rainier in the distance, the soon-to-be-president joked, “I think I’ll move out here sometime.”

June 29, 1998

“I think I’ll move out here sometime,” Clinton joked at the end of one visit, driving onto Boeing Field as Mount Rainier seemed to rise out of the end of the runway.

August 15, 2000

As his motorcade snaked onto the tarmac at Seattle’s Boeing Field during the 1992 campaign, with Mount Rainier seeming to rise out of the end of the runway, Bill Clinton mused: “I think I may move out here some time.”

Jan 28 2002

Clinton haters would recoil at words once spoken as the presidential motorcade snaked onto Boeing Field, on a clear day with Rainier’s Willis Wall seeming to rise out of the end of the runway. “I think I’ll move out here sometime,” he quipped.

April 17, 2006

As his motorcade drove onto the Boeing Field tarmac, with Mount Rainier seeming to rise out of the runway, then-President Clinton quipped: “I think I’ll move out here sometime.” Clinton was in the Northwest 13 times as president and has returned repeatedly since.

After being trotted out by Connelly out at least nine times, Clinton’s quote is more threadbare than a mattress at Value Village. Note also how the context has changed over the years: Initially, Clinton made his quip in the spring of 1992, during his first presidential campaign. But by 2002, Connelly was claiming the incident happened while Clinton was president, referring to the “presidential motorcade.”

Next week: Joel Connelly on lunch!


CommentsRSS icon

All Bill Clinton has to do to "move out her" is to register to vote at Connelly's cabin

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

I would guess Stefan needs some blow jobs - Does Monica have a Seattle clone / friend who likes to service hairy neocons?

Mud Wrestling

Erica-Josh v. Joel at Key Arena. Who needs the Sonics?

The thing to ask about Joel is that if he didn't work for the P-I -- say he merely had a blog like Stefan -- would anyone actually read him? The answer is obviously 'No.' He hasn't said anything of interest in years. It is only his institutional relationship i.e. he's got a job at the P-I, which makes his words of any importance.

Here's where you see one of the interesting things about the blogosphere. Guys like Stefan -- and just to balance it out, guys like Goldy -- have a readership because they actually have something to say.

Consider how many people would read Joel if he was a blogger and not a columnist for legacy media.

Connelly likes to play cat-and-mouse with Seattle Leftists. Somedays he's grumpy, other days cynical, but most of the time he's just cracking the liberal agenda talking points like Ken Schram.

Whine, whine, whine--what makes him think he's qualified to opine?

Btw, my point applies to most of the local columnists. Would anyone read Westneat, Jamieson, Brodeur, Balter or Paynter if they had no institutional base?

Don't make me laugh.

None of them have anything interesting to say on their own.

The funny thing is that the Stranger has never worshiped Licata, especially compared to its coverage of Nicastro or Nickels in the early parts of their terms in office. Connelly's anti-left quips are not only lame and petty, but, as his most recent columns shows, often simply wrong.

I love how he can't even get the quote right...Is it "I might move out here" or "I think I'll move out here somtime" or "I think I may move out here some time"?

Who knows? Remind me never to get quoted by Joel.

Entering this a little late but...
Ouch! I wonder if Joel is related to my dad? I've heard the same story about Jerry Lewis flying on the same plane an my dad about a dozen times.

Erica,
Google how many times Savage has written about how he likes skinny guys with big mouths and long blond hair.

Postergirl: I am glad you mentioned that, because that is exactly the same thing. Apples to apples and all that.

Um, Joel Connolly's actually a pretty decent columnist.

And a hell of a lot more people read him than read Sharkansky, who is hardly "one of the interesting things about the blogosphere", except in the sense of "it's interesting that in the blogosphere such garbage can continue to be produced in massive quantities even though no one except the creator is interested."

of course it's always possible that joel kept quoting that repeated phrase as a joke on clinton. or a joke on a future writer who he knew would dig it up and make hay out of it. then again, who cares? nice to see ecb has a new media target. the stranger sure has been quiet about the weekly since new times came to town. gee, i wonder why that is.

Dawdy, the "I wonder why" device only works when it's obvious and I, for one, have no idea what you're talking about. So don't be a giant chicken and spill.

ha the whole thing was just me goofing around. nothing specific. or maybe there was.

Bill's going to get a houseboat near the UW actually. After he found out his wife was running for VP with Gore as President for 2008.

"...a hell of a lot more people read him than read Sharkansky..."

Uh...and maybe that's because Joel has the backing of the Hearst organization? And his paper has a circulation in the hundreds of thousands? etc etc

FNARF, are you deliberately missing my point? Or do you simply not understand it?

I'll try walk you through it again. The prime reason Joel has more readers is because he is in a major metrolpolitan daily. Try to imagine if Joel was a mere blogger. Can you honestly suggest that his blog would be very well read?

Joel does local flavor - has immense contacts over the years - and is indeed widely read.

On a blog he would not use the same style, PI likes the pity pissy first person voice, on a blog he would be brillant. More gneral topics, longer, more flavor and story telling. He has it.

Basiclly, good writer with tons of experience and history.

Put him and Rick Anderson together - on a site - top traffic in the Northwest.

Most of the local political blog stuff is copy cat and drivel.

And a great amount taken right off the Times and PI sites. The echo effect.

Joel is not an echo.

Bob,

You are confusing, it seems to me, "reporting" with "commentary."

Sure, if you pit Joel with his contacts built over 30 years & the status at a Hearst paper against Stefan, a private blogger, Joel would get the reporting scoops, so long as scoops are the goal. As to actualy digging out new information, Joel probably just sits at his desk and reads press releases. That's not reporting.

But as to interesting commentary on local matters, Joel simply is way past his prime, if he had one. He's a fat old pompous fool, so full of himself as to be a caricature. His perspective is boring and full of cant. I don't agree with Stefan but he brings up some interesting points and is obviously read by quite a few. (And I don't want to make this too much a Joel versus Stefan thing. The point is whether Joel would hgave readers on his own as a blogger. I say no.)

As to press commentary on City of Seattle politics I'd take Erica or Josh any day of the week over anyone at the PI or Times.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).