Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Good Morning Darcy Burner Fans... | Stirring »

Monday, April 24, 2006

“I’m the only guy in here reading a newspaper…”

Posted by on April 24 at 13:55 PM

A few weeks ago, BBC reporter Matthew Wells flew out to Seattle to do a piece about online journalism, our city’s local newspaper war, and the future of newspapers in general.

During his time here, he went to “one of Seattle’s stylish and ubiquitous coffee shops” (a phrase that sounds great when said in a British accent) and found he was the only person reading an actual paper newspaper (the rest of the customers were reading news on their laptops). He also came up to the Stranger’s offices to talk to me about this controversial story, went down to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer to speak to the P-I’s managing editor about that paper’s online future, and had coffee with Dan from Seattlest.

What did Mr. Wells find? Well, his piece aired Friday on the BBC World Service, and he kindly sent me an MP3 of the broadcast. You can listen to it here.

The piece is quite interesting, although, for the record, I didn’t tell him I’d never bought a newspaper. I do buy newspapers off the street every once in a long while, mostly when I’m in another city. But I don’t subscribe. Being 28, I’ve never seen the point of subscribing to a daily newspaper. By the time I was old enough to afford a subscription, all the daily news I wanted was available for free online. I subscribe to magazines, because I like to read longer pieces in print, and when it went live last fall I subscribed to the New York Times’ TimesSelect because I didn’t think I could live without Frank Rich’s Op-Ed column. But a newspaper subscription — call me young and foolish, but I see it as a waste of money.


CommentsRSS icon

Bitter much?

News flash: This just in, sky is blue!

I like the idea of a "virtual" (or "e" or "cyber") PI.

If I had to kill off one of the papers it would be the uber-banal, feel-good-about-the-status-quo Seattle Times (Besides, I think the Blethen family has a long history of sociopathic members, and we need to stop enabling them)

While the two papers are more and more similar, the PI has always seemed to be the more "grown-up" of the two publications. If they were to go to an online format, with more of a blog feeling, but with seasoned print journalists and columnists, it might be a very interesting experiment.

If nothing else, at least we wouldn't have to scrap the sign ;-)

Eli - make owner Tim pay for all your subs. Trade, professional material.

You have to be kidding. There is no way you can get the same read on line as with the real deal.

Even faster......and quick reference for the last couple of weeks which are kept nearby in the stack.

Give it a try and get Tim to pay. They owe it to you. You are the best writer there......IMHO

The link to the 'controversial story' doesn't work.

Gwen: The link is fixed. Sorry.

Ha, Catalina, so true. I love that sign. It's kinda Gotham, or something i can't quite put my finger on. I think it has a lot to do with my preference for the PI over the times, oh and Jim Moore, cause i am a hopeless Coug fan.

without a doubt the print media's (as we know it), days are numbered. A long, long way from dead, but the writing is on the wall (or on my lap top?). I hope it can adjust and find a way to stick around cause there are some instances where there is no substitute for a real old fashioned paper, and i don't mean just for wrapping fish, or keeping paint spatter off the floor.

I only buy newspapers after elections, except for the print edition of the Wall Street Journal (and I use their opinion/editorial page to wrap fish in).

Besides, I can get free newspapers when I eat lunch at the UW or at my fave diner or sandwich shop, so why kill more trees?

When I travel I buy the paper. Or when it's SIFF (Film Fest) to get the insert or right before Bumbershoot or some other weekend-long festival where the paper has all the schedules and reviews.

I'm not 28, I'm 46.

interesting timing. the NYT on their potential digital ink version of the paper -->

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/24/business/media/24epaper.html

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).