Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« The Future of Literature | Burner Hits Her Target »

Monday, April 3, 2006

Decaffeinated Teabagging

Posted by on April 3 at 14:00 PM

Soooo….

I frequently come to the defense of BDSMers in Savage Love—”they’re not hurting anyone who doesn’t want to be hurt,ā€¯ “so long everything’s consensual, it’s nobody’s business,ā€¯ and, er, “some of my best friends,ā€¯ etc.—but I can’t defend this.

Three Men Charged in Dungeon Castration

CHARLOTTE, N.C. - Three men have been arrested on charges of performing castrations on apparently willing participants in a sadomasochistic “dungeon” in a rural house, authorities said Friday…. Sheriff’s investigators said Richard Sciara, 61, Danny Reeves, 49, and Michael Mendez, 60, admitted performing at least eight surgeries, including castrations and testicle replacements, on six consenting clients over the past year. None of the three is licensed to practice medicine, officials said…

Detectives who searched the home Wednesday found medical supplies that included scalpels, sutures, bandages, anesthetic and artificial replacement testicles, sheriff’s officials said.

Also seized were videotaping equipment, and video recordings of the surgeries, sheriff’s officials said. Photos and videos made at the “dungeon” were apparently featured on a locally produced sadomasochistic Web site, officials said.

“This right here beats anything I have ever seen,” Sheriff Tom Alexander told the Asheville Citizen-Times, which reported that victims may have come from as far away as South America.

Each man faces 10 felony counts—five each of castration without malice and conspiracy to commit castration without malice—as well as eight misdemeanor counts of performing medical acts without a license.

Castration without malice?

I’ve got to give credit to the lawmakers who had the foresight to make castration without malice a crime. I mean, had non-malicious castrations—friendly castrations? just-between-chums castrations?— been a problem in North Carolina in the past? Or did someone in North Carolina’s legislature see this coming and act well in advance? Or… eesh… does this law have something to do with slavery?

For the record, there are some men out there who want to have their balls cut off. Some are sadomasochists, some are not. But I don’t think it’s a desire that anyone ought to accommodate—there’s no way it can be regarded as safe or sane, and even if someone agrees to it—hell, longs for it—castration is so extreme that consenting to it proves that you’re not mentally fit to consent to anything.

But for some men, giving up their testicles is the ultimate act of sexual surrender. Most men with castration fantasies don’t go through with it, as for most castration fetishists the thrills are to be found in anticipating/fearing that surrender. They may act out castration scenarios, but they want to live to enjoy their fantasies another day, so they hang on to their balls.


CommentsRSS icon

--But for some men, giving up their testicles is the ultimate act of sexual surrender.

Isn't that what marriage is for?

Ba-boom! Thank you ladies and gentlemen, I'll be peforming in Tahoe all next week!!

...telling my jokes.

At least it is a fetish that once, satified, can't be repeated AND it removes our slightly disturbed freiends out of the gene pool, thus improving it.

Love from Australia **

I don't agree with you, Dan. I would object to DIY castration because it is unsafe and has the potential for permanent harm if the castrati are infected by non-sterile instruments or procedures. However, simply objecting because you don't think someone sane could want his jewels junked is just not a legitimate argument. Would you say the same thing about MTF trannies? Obviously, the issues are not completely parallel, but perhaps similar.

I think people should be able to modify their bodies however they want as long as it doesn't impose an undue burden on others (i.e. having all your limbs removed and then needing special accommodations at work or, in this case, getting horribly infected while having your balls cut off and putting your family back the cost of a funeral). Practicing medicine without a license, yes, but the non-malicious castrations thing is just BS.

So I take it, Dan, that you're also against legalization of assisted suicide? Or is castration a fate worse than death?

As I was reading I thought the article was going to say "Each man faces 10 felony counts ā€” for five castrations, at one felony per ball"

hot

Before you write this off as a ultra-fringe fetish of the mentally ill, check out www.eunuch.org. There's a personal ads section full of guys looking to have their balls, cocks, or both cut off. There are also thousands of (mostly fantasy) erotic stories uploaded by men and women, straight and gay. It appears to be a pretty common fantasy - although you're right, one that rarely gets acted out. I agree with the comment that practicing medicine without a license should be prosecuted. But it should be legal for a guy to get snipped if he wants it... call it kinky cosmetic surgery.

Icky dude. Icky.

MOTHER FUCK!

I'm going to recycle a comment on this topic that I left on another blog: "Let's not confuse licensure with expertise. I, and other direct entry midwives can't be licensed in my state (yet we could be in 26 others) but I consider myself a skilled practioner. Licensing can be just a state-sponsored monopoly." Is prosecuting the castrators going to reduce the number of wanna-be castratees, or just increase the number of DIY-ers?

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).