Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« On David Foster Wallace | Civil War Watch »

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

Annie Proulx Stabs Hollywood with her Pen

Posted by on March 14 at 9:51 AM

Thanks to the The Guardian, readers all over the world now have the chance to experience this year’s Academy Awards ceremony from the inside, with “Brokeback Mountain” author (and fierce Brokeback Mountain supporter) Annie Proulx offering this essay on her experience at Hollywood’s night of nights.

Splashiest part of Proulx’s smart and stylish essay: Her open disdain for Crash, the Best Picture winner she refers to as Trash, before offering this prediction: “Next year we can look to the awards for controversial themes on the punishment of adulterers with a branding iron in the shape of the letter A, runaway slaves, and the debate over free silver.”

Enjoy!


CommentsRSS icon

What I find really sad is that a great writer like Annie Proulx has gotten so emotionally invested in the Hollywood system that she actually started to believe that (a) Brokeback had a chance to win an Oscar and that (b) winning an Oscar means something important to artistic integrity. The Best Picture Oscar ALWAYS goes to a piece of crap, and almost always to a sanctimonious piece of crap. That's what it's FOR. She should drag her ass back to Montana and write some more books.

Yeah, her rage is kinda from outer space, but cut her some slack. Proulx comes from a world where artistic merit plays a legitimate role in awards and acclaim, and being thrown into the world of the Oscars—where the sentence "And the winner of the Best Picture Oscar is...Forrest Gump!" is factual—must have been jarring as shit...

What is from outer space is her delusion that the Independent Spirit Awards are any more merit-based.

I find it disconcerting that Proulx attributes the film's failure to win Best Picture to the fact that the decision was made by academy voters living "cloistered lives behind wrought-iron gates." A frighteningly similar argument is used by the right to explain how films like Brokeback Mountain get made in the first place. So which is it? Is Hollywood so hopelessly out of step with mainstream American culture that the industry failed to understand that Brokeback would never gain popular support outside of marginalized liberal circles? Or is Hollywood so hopelessly out of step with mainsteam American culture that they failed to understand how much support there is throughout the nation for big-screen representations of attractive, sympathetic gay characters? Or are both sides of the debate so determined to focus on what's wrong with *Hollywood* that they ignore a more significant debate about what is (or isn't) wrong with the country as a whole?

I like her channeling Joan Didion's "Play It As It Lays" skewering of Hollywood, but does anyone besides Proulx think that racial conflict is so "yesterday" in L.A.? I know there have been fewer riots in Montana, of course.

gimme a fuckin' break -- her rant in pathetic. she's been wildly successful in her career and seems to feel that the world owes her every possible award and accolade. you don't see heath ledger pitching a fit.
maybe brokeback got shafted at the academy awards but COME ON. crash was hardly 'trash.' it was a lot better than that enormously dull 'shitting news.' and no, i don't give a fuck how many copies the book sold. it was a slow, sentimental piece of crap.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).