What Won’t You Print?
I sent the following questionnaire to the editors of the P-I, the Times, the Weekly, and the Stranger:
1. Would your paper, under any circumstances, print the word “nigger”?
2. Would your paper, under any circumstances, print a swastika?
3. Would your paper, under any circumstances, print full-frontal nudity?
4. Would your paper, under any circumstances, print a violently degrading image of a woman? (For example: this banned album art from the Guns n’ Roses record Appetite for Destruction, featuring a nauseating cartoon of a woman who has just been raped by a robot. Here’s a link to the image featured in a story by the Guardian.)
5. Does your paper have a fixed policy on what potentially offensive materials it will or won’t print?
So far, the Stranger and the Times have answered. Where are you, P-I and Weekly? I want to finish my survey!
This has nothing to do with the survey, but I feel compelled to point out the fact that some have argued that the banned G 'n R artwork depicts the robot preparing to assassinate the looming, red-hued creature in the sky as retribution for committing the rape. The reverse has also been posited: that the creature is preparing to kill the robot rapist in some sort of celestial retaliation. Either way, it's probably just nerdy metal fans trying to justify misogyny, but I've always had an inexplicable fascination with the artwork. I'm always looking for a girlie T on Ebay with this art--a predictably futile search. And I call myself a feminist. Sheesh.