Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« The View from the Skyline | Sims's Editorial Was Cool, but... »

Wednesday, February 22, 2006

Sonic Reducer

Posted by on February 22 at 16:42 PM

K.C. Executive Ron Sims and City Council President Nick Licata both believe the taxing authority the state legislature is thinking of handing over to King County to revamp Key Arena should be available whether the Sonics stay or not. (The pending legislation only greenlights the taxing authority if the Sonics are part of the equation. In other words, it’s a corporate subsidy for the Sonics.)

Sims wrote an editorial in the Seattle Times this morning arguing that revamping Key Arena and Seattle Center should not be dependent on the Sonics’ presence.

And Licata is actually peddling an amendment to the Olympia legislation that would allow the tax dollar revenue to go to remodel Key Arena—with or without the Sonics. “The current [legislation] denies the city the option of trying to run the Key Arena profitably without the Sonics,” Licata says.

Meanwhile, Seattle Center released a giant study today hyping their positive economic impact on the region. The study says that Seattle Center generates $1.15 billion for the local economy. If one is to believe the Sonics’ recent claims that they generate $234 million (the Seattle Center didn’t break out in line items), that’s only 1/5 of the Center’s economic impact. (And part of the Sonics’ claims relied on those whopping player salaries, which certainly don’t all flow to this region.)

After a press conference today hyping the Center study, I sat down with Center Director Virginia Anderson and asked if she agreed with Sims and Licata that the pending tax revenues should come without the Sonics requirement, she said: “Absolutely. Yes.”

She then went onto lecture me about creating community before cutting herself off and banging her fist on the table (startling everyone else in the room), laughing: “I know that’s not what you care about. You’re just interested in the Sonics legislation. But you’re interviewing me, God damn it!” The startled bunch of Center employees and press flacks, who had turned their attention to us, started roaring with laughter.


CommentsRSS icon

Virginia Anderson says that it's all about "community"? And people started laughing. That's exactly correct.

people out on the street
they dont know who I am
I watch them from my room
they are just passing by
but I'm not just anyone, no
I'm not just anyone...

...I got my devil machine
and my lectronic train

I'm the sonic reducer...sonic reducer...

Josh's post is incorrect on one crucial point. The claim that the proposed legislation "only greenlights the taxing authority if the Sonics are part of the equation. In other words, it’s a corporate subsidy for the Sonics" is incorrect.
The bill, which was drafted by King County Budget Director Bob Cowan, creates a flexible, unencumbered civic amenities fund, the usage of which my boss, Ron Sims, has stated will prioritize arts funding first, Safeco Field renovations second, and then other worthwhile civic projects of regional significance. That could include KeyArena, or, more appropriately, funds for a broader rethink of Seattle Center in its entirety (as the op-ed stated). Nothing in the bill mandates money to KeyArena if the Sonics stay, or bars spending money on the arena if they chose to leave. It really, truly, honestly -- cross my heart and hope to die -- is designed as a broadly construed civic amenties fund, not as a narrowly-tailored Sonics bailout bill.

Right, Sandeep - and maybe 10% of the money will go to anything other than rebuilding an arena that was completely rebuilt (from the ground up!) 10 years ago.

No offense, but your turd polishing skills need work (granted - stadiums are tough to spin!).

Sandeep: Section 6 (b) (i) of the bill says the money can only be collected "subject to the following limitations: that a lessee that owns or controls a national basketball association franchise, and as of the effective date of this act, a women's national basketball association franchise has entered into a binding and legally enforceable contractual commitment to lease the multipurpose public arena..."

I know Sims's office is saying that language works as a protection against the Sonics bailing on Seattle, but it goes both ways: The money isn't there without the Sonics.

In legislative disputes, specific trumps general & the sonics language is tres specific. The elastic clause you're referring to is ambiguous on this point.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).