Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Prophetic Quote from Wilfrid S... | The Gift that Keeps on Giving »

Tuesday, February 14, 2006

Not Since Carrie

Posted by on February 14 at 9:48 AM

First let me explain that subject line: Not Since Carrie is the title of a book about flop Broadway musicals, the foremost of which is arguably the titular Carrie, which was, indeed, a musical based on Stephen King’s classic horror tale of telepathy, abuse, and a prom gone horribly wrong. Enjoy some review excerpts here. (Click “What Went Wrong” on the right side of the screen.)

Which brings us to The Wedding Singer, the Broadway-bound new musical based on the hit Adam Sandler/Drew Barrymore comedy, which opened a pre-Broadway run last Thursday at Seatle’s 5th Avenue Theater.

I never saw Carrie, but I did see opening night of The Wedding Singer, or at least the first half of it, after which my friend Keith dragged me from the theater and away to a bar. The previous year, Keith had travelled to New York to see Taboo, the England-in-the-’80s musical based on the life of and featuring music written by Boy George and produced by Rosie O’Donnell. Taboo was a notorious flop, and upon fleeing The Wedding Singer, Keith said, “That was much, much worse than Taboo.”

Forgive my reliance on third-party opinion, but based on his Taboo experience alone, Keith’s opinion on the propsects of a would-be Broadway musical is worth more than mine. Me, I found The Wedding Singer: The Musical oddly klunky and close to charmless—crude judgments I found expanded and explained in this review from the website Broadwayworld.com. (My two favorite sentences: “[The song] ‘Come Out of the Dumpster’ seems more about Julia getting Robbie out of an actual dumpster than the friendship builder it should be,” and “It just doesn’t seem realistic that actual people would talk this much about the time period they are in.”)

So far the reviews have been mixed to really mixed, the main exception being this bizarre offering from the Seattle P-I. Of course, these reviews are of a show that’s essentially a workshop, with the possibility of problematic kinks being ironed out before the show hits New York. But can The Wedding Singer do the necessary work before its April 27 Broadway debut?

Place your bets…maybe The Wedding Singer will thrive as a critic-proof must-see for the bridal set, like Mamma Mia with the Abba songs replaced by limp Mr. Mister rejects. Or maybe it’s doomed to follow Taboo…Stay tuned.


CommentsRSS icon

the radio ads of this production are painful to the ear! while i don't claim to be a musical broadway show expert, i am tired of seeing movies made into big live productions..seems lazy! how many times can you present the same story? seems similar in how the movie industry does a big screen version of mediocre tv shows from yesteryear..no new ideas or just looking to make money?

All I can say is REMEMBER HUNCHBACK.

It's about money. Musicals are the closest thing modern Broadway has to sure-fire moneymakers, and many artistically negligible-or-worse musicals enjoy long, rich runs. Chalk it to the decay of American culture or the tourist allure of seeing "A Broadway Musical!"; either way, it's a fact (see "Cats") and the good news is that sometimes artistically rich shows hit the jackpot too (see "The Light in the Piazza," which just announced a national tour today.)

What was most offensive to me about "The Wedding singer" wasn't its lowly cinemtic origins or basic dullness--it was the endless onslaught of what my friend Mindy (a recent bride) dubbed "wedding porn." In "The Wedding Singer," practically every sentimental step on the way to the altar gets its own number: "Pop the Question!", or the formerly rappin' Granny's pre-wedding night sex-education song...it was merciless, and in this age of rising consciousness about the inequality of America's marriage laws, my annoyance began to grow into offense. But then--sweet hallelujah!--came intermission...

sitting through at least two hours of 'wedding porn' set in the 1980s does seem torturous.

Oh, thank you, Tina, thank you, for remembering Hunchback—who could ever forget the Hunchback Dancers, so credited in the program?

Sigh. It was beautiful.

Musical Theatre has some serious work to do before it'll become relevant again. Right now, the format and approach is still hopelessly stuck in the 60's.

Oh, Gomez. Go to New York. See the new Sweeny Todd...

"All I can say is REMEMBER HUNCHBACK"

Geez, Tina - did you have to remind us?All six of us (including Dan apparently), who still suffer Post Traumatic Hunchback Syndrome (PTHS) at the merest thought of that torturous piece of drek?

As for "The Wedding Singer", clearly producer Margo Lion and her gang (which includes Clear Channel, and Lions Gate Films - makers of the film version - among others) think they've figured out how to capture lightning in a bottle. Unfortunately, I think this is more a case of proving that "lightning never strikes twice".

Robbie nails a lot of the structural problems with the show squarely on the head, as did Jerry Kraft in his review on SeattleActor.com. And FWIW, both do a helluva better job at actual critical analysis than anything you'll see in the majors or even (sorry guys), "The Stranger".

One nice thing about not being limited to a few column inches...

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).