Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Heightened Discussion | Photography, LSD, Cheney »

Wednesday, February 22, 2006

I Love the Port Story

Posted by on February 22 at 11:00 AM

I love it because it’s starting to feel a bit like the Danish cartoon controversy, in the sense that it’s pulling back the curtain on two of the most difficult relationships of this historical moment: the relationship between the West and the Arab world, and the relationship between individual nations and globalization.

And like the cartoon issue, there are more ironies than easy answers in the port debate. Here’s my current favorite irony:

The Bush administration, to support its foreign policy aims, has made a point of exploiting Americans’ fears of terrorism and the dim understanding people in this country have of the Arab world. Now the same administration that nurtured Americans’ confusion about which Arabs attacked us on Sept. 11 (Remember when a huge percentage of Americans thought Saddam Hussein was responsible for 9/11?) — this same administration now wants the average American to start differentiating between scary Arabs and not-so-scary Arabs, between a shipping company owned by the United Arab Emirates and the checkered history the UAE has in combating terrorism and nuclear proliferation, between the Arab allies we would want running our ports (apparently, the UAE) and the Arab allies we wouldn’t want running our ports (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, etc.) Good luck, Mr. President.

Marueen Dowd has a great column today, in which she describes Bush as having been “hoist on his own petard” on this issue. She means in terms of the security debate:

For four years, the White House has accused anyone in Congress or the press who defended civil liberties or questioned anything about the Iraq war of being soft on terrorism. Now, as Congress and the press turn that accusation back on the White House, Mr. Bush acts mystified by the orgy of xenophobia.

She’s right. But he’s also being hoist on the petard of Republican xenophobia — a xenophobia that Bush and others rely on to rally their base. The port story is about security, sure, but it’s also about a lot of Republicans now having to assure their constituents that they don’t want the United Arab Emirates running our ports, either.


CommentsRSS icon

Remember when a huge percentage of Americans thought Saddam Hussein was responsible for 9/11?

No need to remember just yet, as that is still the case. It turns out that a reasonably sane interpretation of historical events is unusual.

It certainly is delicious irony, and an issue that's likely to severely fracture the corporate/religious split in the GOP. So yay.

Or not. The Republican congress has proven that 'the public' is committed to the War On Terror.



To quote John Podhoretz

"The public reaction to the ports deal indicates that the American people are still very much committed to the War on Terror. They understand that Arab nations of the Persian Gulf cannot be and should not be deemed reliable colleagues in our struggle against militant, extremist Islam. . . .



It is wrong to ascribe popular feeling against the deal to isolationism. The American people can't make sense out of which side Dubai is on, and they don't think it should be that hard a call. They believe in the fight, and their continued support for it is the best news the embattled Bush presidency could have. "

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).