Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« The Best Thing To Happen To Je... | God's Anger »

Wednesday, February 15, 2006

Freedom of Speech

Posted by on February 15 at 11:20 AM

Okay, can we talk about Toon Wars as a straight-up freedom of speech issue now? A cartoonist in Germany is in hiding after drawing a cartoon—yes, an offensive one—that didn’t even depict he-who-must-not-be-drawn. A cartoonist at a daily paper in Ohio is under attack for drawing a cartoon that made fun of CNN for not showing the Mohammed cartoons, a cartoon that featured an image of Mohammed but with his face blurred out—which is precisely how Muslims in many Islamic countries depict Mohammed.

Blogger Eugene Volokh comments:

So I guess it’s not just that we aren’t supposed to draw pictures of Mohammed as terrorist, or of Mohammed at all; we aren’t even supposed to draw pictures that are obviously not of Mohammed, and that are meant to mock the inability to draw pictures of Mohammed.” (Via Sullivan.)

Volokh links to a story in an Ohio paper:

“They take the prize for being the most ill-intended, irresponsible property group,” he said. “Allah curses and condemns them and every Muslim in this community should curse and condemn them.”

Julia A. Shearson, director of Ohio’s Council of American-Islamic Relations, said they want the Beacon Journal to apologize for running the “unethical” cartoon and want the paper to publish their letters to the editor.

After yesterday’s press conference, Bok met with several leaders. The cartoonist said he drew the cartoon to take a shot at CNN for “distorting a distortion” and not at the prophet or Muslims… .

Still, Muslim leaders said Bok’s cartoon was disrespectful because the prophet should not have been depicted in such a way. In fact, they said, there are no pictures or statues of Muhammad because he should not be confused with God… .

There are no pictures or statues of Mohammed? Really?


CommentsRSS icon

Curse you and your fact based reasoning!!

May a thousand whoresons wreak havoc on your houses!!

Whacky fundamentalist nutbags oppose all manner of innocuous activities and would sooner I were dead or in prison for thinking, speaking or writing as I do. This is not news to me. You are not the first to discover this absurdity.

So far the only real difference I've seen between our positions is in how we would choose to respond to this absurdity.

Of course you can talk about it as a "straight up freedom of speech issue." Now, as then, that characterization would be oversimple and not quite accurate. "Freedom of speech" means nothing to fundamentalist nutbags, it has hypocritical undertones for more moderate fundamentalists, it seems dangerous but necessary for temperance-preaching faithful, and it means something very different in Europe than it does in the U.S.

I take a contrary position to yours not because I oppose "free speech," but because I consider your strategy impotent and showy. I don't even oppose the republication of the cartoons -- I only oppose republishing them in a reactionary context that escalates a dangerous holy war. And even then I wouldn't support outlawing speech I consider to be irresponsible.

Are we at odds because my outrage doesn't measure up to yours? Give me a problem I can solve. Otherwise I've got better things to do with my words.

your volokh links don't work

This cartoon issue is ridiculous. The cartoons were not terribly clever and Muslims have grossly over-reacted.

It is tragic that many religions are so closely tied to radical fundamentalism that the rights of non-secular publications to exercise the freedom of speech are met with threats from radical sects. It is even worse that these threats are credible.

There seems to be a paradox between protecting the rights of a *relatively* free and democratic society against religious fundamentalism of all types - Christian or Muslim - and the consequences for contributing to the ever-escalating cultural tensions. It is obscene that in the name of religion and love for their god, that people respond to the media paradox with acts of violence.

Going back to the cartoon/animation issue: Does anyone else recall that South Park had an episode a few years ago featuring Jesus and his Super-Best Friends (including Mohammed) battling David Blaine for world domination? Where was the outrage then or do Muslims not watch South Park? Speaking of which, South Park regularly mocks Jesus, too - why aren't all the put-the-Christ-back-in-Christmas-Christians getting their panties in a twist again?

In related news... Israeli's announce their own "anti-semitic cartoon contest"

http://www.boomka.org/

If you offend thousands of people, especially if it's intentional, you're likely going to get people threatening and becoming violent (remember WTO?). Nobody is defending those people and they are obviously nutjobs (and a tiny minority).

I don't get criticizing people for complaining or boycotting, though. Complaints and boycotts are protected by -- what's that? -- freedom of speech.

Here's a pre-emptive complaint for you publishing the winners of the Holocaust cartoon contest. It took balls to publish cartoons offending a people whose members including stars of TV and politics, but I just found them distasteful.

now i want to see a roadrunner and coyote cartoon with an acme brand agitprop .. oh wait, that might not possible anymore...." the cartoon wars" indeed.

For the record: The cartoon Dan obviously refers to - showing 4 members of the Iranian national soccer team as suicide bombers next to four German players in full combat gear with the headline "Why the Army is definetely needed at the soccer world cup" - was not offensive if one knows its background: It lampoons demands by conservative politicians for widening the use of the German army for domestic purposes, inter alia for policing the soccer world cup. The cartoonist deemed the alledged need for the army being deployed here as totally exaggerated and tried to show this via a ridiculous scenario - soccer players as suicide bombers. The angered Iranians either didn't see (due to lack of knowledgy about the current political debate in Germany) or didn't want to see that the cartoon was just highly ironic.

It looks like you really had a nice time.

I like your website alot...its lots of fun... you have to help me out with mine...

A very nice website !! Very well Done !!!

Very interesting and professional site! Good luck!

I like this site!

Hello and congratulations!

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).