Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« In Case Anyone Was Wondering..... | Get Your Stranger Valentine In... »

Friday, January 20, 2006

Today’s Lesson: America is Screwed

Posted by on January 20 at 22:16 PM

I began today with a brief stop at Bartell’s. As I was checking out (chocolate, toothpaste, and batteries), a young male employee (overeager, glasses, hair with product) had the following exchange with a middle-aged woman employee (tired, glasses, no product):

“Good morning!” he shouted.
“Good morning,” she replied.
“I saw you coming out of the elevator!”
“Oh really?”
“Yeah, I came running and shouting at you!”
“Oh. I didn’t notice.”
“Yeah, I was running!”
[awkward silence.]
“I guess I didn’t notice. I guess you could’ve been a rapist.”
[awkward silence.]
“Yeah,” she repeated. “A rapist. And I wouldn’t have even noticed.”

He nodded awkwardly, probably feeling as nauseated as I wasit was a bit early in the morning for rape jokesand life went on. Was she trying to tell us something? Tell him something?

I ended today, ironically enough, at Cowgirls, Inc., where I rode the mechanical bull. I’ve never been to the Inc. before, never even considered going, but the staff was nice, the jukebox was rockin’ (in an AC/DC and Zep kind of way), and the mechanical bull was great fun. It jerked in unexpected directions and dared me to keep my balance. I eventually fell offeverybody doestried to look cool leaving the bullpen and ordered a beer from a woman dancing on the bar. And I thought: “I review plays all the time. I wish they were as unpredictable as that mechanical bull.” And then I thought: “If an art form is more predictable than a mechanical bull, it’s in bad trouble.”

By the way: Did you hear about the honors-student high school debater who got in serious, serious trouble for simply positing, in a discussion, that one example of violent revolutionary protest would be to plant a bomb in the school? And his principal, a very popular, and by all accounts effective, woman got fired for not reporting him to the police? He didn’t threaten anything, as far as we can tell from the news reports. He was just illustrating a point.

Remember: The ragtag American army won the Revolution because it was fast, adaptive, guerilla, and creative, while the Brits lost because they were orderly, mechanized, and disciplined. The famous anecdote from when I was a schoolboy in Lexington, MA, went like this: During the Revolutionary War, British troops would march in formation down a country road while American snipers sat in trees. The snipers would pick off soldiers one by one, killing some troops and terrorizing the rest, while the ever-stoic Brits couldn’t break ranks and fire back unless their commandersat the head of the phalanx, who never noticedordered them to. This was a very effective strategy for the Americans.

In conclusion, today’s events have indicated that America has lost the nimble, creative, no-holds-barred virtues that made it the most artistically, intellectually, and militarily powerful country in the world. Now we’re repressed (rape “joke”), mechanized (art vs. bull), bureaucratic (punishing kids and principals for a hypothetical), and stupid.

We’re totally fucked.


CommentsRSS icon

"What country before ever existed a century & half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is its natural manure." -Thomas Jefferson (November 13, 1787)

The ragtag American army won the Revolution because it was fast, adaptive, guerilla, and creative, while the Brits lost because they were orderly, mechanized, and disciplined.

That's good for a school boy from Mass but it's not accurate. Tactics can determine the outcome of a battle, but rarely a war. That the colonies won their independence had more to do with the Great Power conflict in Europe and that the Continental Army while often defeated was never taken out of play.

But good 'nuff for a mini-essay.

We're totally fucked.

Nah.

A fellow in Seattle got a visit from the Secret Service for posting a sign in his yard suggesting harm to the president. It seems that a statement like that can get you five years in prison.

I would like to see the Stranger publish an editorial that makes the case for a treason trial for the president and senior officials, resulting in a guilty verdict, and following the exaustion of appeals, the lawful application of the death penalty.

Tim Keck has balls, but it would take balls of steel to publish that.

Hey, Tim:

Fuck off.

Dan

Yeah, Tim, shut up. Just SHUT UP!

I agree that the US is on a distinctly crusty and old-womanish path, but I suspect that stuff about the rebels winning the war on pure feistiness (feist?) is pretty much (mechanical) bullshit.

pliny, brian, you're both wrong.

What Brendan is paraphrasing is a very tried-and-true method for when a country is invaded by a vastly superior power. The concept is that you don't have to win, all you have to do is avoid losing. War has always been very, very expensive. By prolonging the war, by forcing the invading country to maintain strong military presence, you weaken the ruling government's popularity at home, drain it's resources, and invite the enemies of the invaders, countries w/ a viable military, to begin circling like vultures. It worked in the Pennisular War, it worked in Vietnam. Nitpick all you want over the very different military/political realities in both of those examples, but both of those situations, along w/ the American Revolution, had the same concept behind their insurrections, and they were all successful because of it. The only time it doesn't work is when the invading country also has settlers, colonists, etc, to counter-balance the 'home-field' advantage. (The Boer War, the American invasion of the West.)

As for the Iraq War, an effective way of fighting the "fail to lose" strategy is to splinter the different insurgent groups. Have them fight each other, so that the people in the country will view the invaders as the lesser of evils, hopefully before the folks at home get tired of the war. It looks like this is what the US is doing right now, roiling the Sunnis vs. the Shi'ites vs. the Kurds.

I'm not sure it will work, though. What most Americans have forgotten, and that Iraqia haven't, is the US-led embargo, resulting in the deaths of tens of thousands, and the betrayal of Iraq after the first gulf war, when Bush failed to support the popular uprising he had invited, and many were slaughtered because of it.

I agree with you, Dave Bowman. But I think the scrappy guerrilla tactics that are part of the conventional narrative of the American Revolution are not a necessary part of the strategy you describe. For example, the Romans successfully used this strategy in the Second Punic War, but without becoming guerrillas.

I think the reason the rebels won the American Revolution was not because they were, as Brendan says, "fast, adaptive, guerilla, and creative," but because their strategy was based, as you say, on not losing. Whether they retreated from the British in strict formation or melted like shadows into the forest was irrelevant.

I should also note, just to be perfectly up-front, that I am pretty much pulling this all out of my ass, as I know virtually nothing about military history.

pliny, brian, you're both wrong.

No I'm not.

The concept is that you don't have to win, all you have to do is avoid losing.

That is what I meant when I said "the Continental Army while often defeated was never taken out of play." Sorry I did not make it clear.

What-if questions are a fool's game but it is certain that Great Britan saw the rebellion here as a distraction from the real conflict in Europe, and never was able to devote all of her considerable military power in the Americas. And too the French crown did not help us because they loved liberty but to check English ambition in the Americas and elsewhere.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).