Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« This is what it sounds like... | Flip over to KCTS »

Thursday, January 19, 2006

And the Candidates Are…

Posted by on January 19 at 20:09 PM

The city council spent the day interviewing 14 candidates for council position #9, and I spent the day watching them.
For the interviews, the council split up into two groups and spoke with candidates for 24 minutes each, asking predetermined questions sent to candidates by email earlier this week. One group met in council chambers; the other in a cramped conference room outside the mayor’s office on the seventh floor. Virtually no members of the public showed up to watch the interviews; the audience, such as it was, was made up almost exclusively of reporters and city staff. Unlike last week’s parade of wannabes, unknowns and also-rans, today’s aspirants were serious contenders, identified as “semifinalists” by the council on Tuesday.
What distinguished today’s candidates from one another, more than their political leanings (all are liberal Democrats), were their specific positions on issues from the Alaskan Way Viaduct to bus-rapid transit. I won’t try to summarize all their responses here; instead, I’ll highlight a few moments that grabbed my attention:

• Dolores Sibonga, a former city council member who says she won’t run for reelection if she gets the position (but didn’t rule out the possibility of running for another seat), said she supported “increased bus service” now that the monorail to Ballard and West Seattle is dead, but had little response to council members who pointed out that buses, unlike elevated or subway trains, get stuck in traffic. “I wasn’t altogether sold on the monorail because it… took people off buses,” Sibonga said. “Elevated transportation cuts light and air and access for people on the stret.”

• Venus Velazquez, a public-relations consultant who some say has been difficult to work with, seemed to rub some council members the wrong way when she answered pointed questions about how she would respond to minorities who oppose linking gay rights to civil rights by laughing uncomfortably and dodging. “The bus is big enough for all of us… When one group goes down the rest of us go down.” (Velazquez also had an annoying tendency to speak in corporate PR jargon, e.g. “building bridges,” “keep everyone moving up the economic ladder,” “all things being equal,” “finding win-win solutions,” “bringing everybody to the table,” etc.)

• Attorney Joann Francis took a tough stance on police accountability, supporting indemnification from officer lawsuits and access to unredacted officer complaints for Office of Police Accountability Review Board members. She did raise a few eyebrows, however, when she talked about her work as an attorney for First and Goal, the Paul Allen corporation that built and operates Seahawks Stadium. And she floundered a little when asked what cuts she would make in difficult budget times, stating the obvious “you listen to the public in terms of specific priorities and go to basic services that the government’s responsible for” without answering the question.

• Sally Clark, the Lifelong AIDS Alliance employee and former aide to ex-city council member Tina Podlodowski, came across as poised and well-versed in city issues, while Stella Chao seemed vague and unspecific, talking generally about “working collaboratively toward common goals” without identifying what those goals might be.

• Javier Valdez responded pointedly to Tom Rasmussen’s question about whether he would be an independent council member, given that he has worked for the last five years under the mayor as an employee of City Light: “You were the head of the mayor’s office for senior citizens [when you ran for office], council member Rasmussen, and I think you’ve really done your job remarkably well,” he said.

• Verlene Jones, a union organizer, elicited some puzzled looks when she referred to the Alaskan Way Viaduct as “one of the beauties of Seattle,” continuing effusively, “It’s very rare that you can call a freeway a beauty. I would hate to lose that beautiful vision I have every morning of our city that gets me going, gets me pumped, makes me happy to be here.”

• Sharon Maeda, alone among all the candidates, expressed interest in a proposal to tear down the Alaskan Way Viaduct and replace its capacity with improvements to surface streets downtown, noting that while she was living at Harbor Steps, across from the viaduct, “I would occasionally see little pieces of concrete falling off it.”

On Monday, January 23, the council will announce its list of six finalists. They’ll interview those finalists throughout the week, and will likely choose a new council member on Thursday. Peter Steinbrueck tried unsuccessfully on Tuesday to convince his colleagues to hold a public hearing on the three top contenders, but his effort failed, and no public hearing is planned.
For more on the top 14 contenders, see the council’s web site.


CommentsRSS icon

Excellent work!

Sally Cl;ark has an early careet in community jornalism, first wiriting at the Lesbin Resouce monthy newspaper, thence as full time editor at Seattle Gay News for a year plus.

She was excellent. I publish the Gay News and have always though Sally was headed to the top.

Impressive as well was Ross Baker. Calm, cool, srticuate and very poised. Like a natural fit. He was govt, policy direstor at the AIDS Foundation for a long period in the 90;s.

Surprised that most candidates seemed not well preparted for obvious and free form questions.

Each was asked about civil rights, and most did well, outing a lesbian sister, and giving a lot of mention to POCAAN, AIDS Foundation, and support for the Cal Anderson Bill.

Go Sally. Go Ross.

Javier Valdez should get extra points for upbraiding Tom Rasmussen, for being the two-faced hack he is. How can you work for the City of Seattle and run for the City Council, he asked? Well, you tell me big guy? What a smirking fool.
These other people are an odd pack: A flack who thinks comparing the civil rights movement to the struggle (today) to secure equal rights for gays and lesbians is laughable; a tired old hack who thinks that buses will replace a monorail (that might have done squat); and finally, a fucking attorney for "First and Goal." Jesus H. Christ, why don't we just make Paul Allen, his own darn self a member of the City Council and be done with it?
What a pathetic bunch of chumps, save for one decent possibility: Daryl Smith. He's still in the running, as I recall. And he seems to walk on the same planet as the rest of us, not the imagined middle earth of the rest of the clown show.

Josh should get the job, but isn't he afraid of dogs?

please, do not bogart my handle

Verlene Jones clearly was referring to the view when driving into town on the viaduct. Having driven on it one or two times, I can attest that the view from there is indeed picturesque, even if it is dangerous given its crumbling state.

Though I wasn't physically present at today's panel session, I did watch every moment on Seattle Channel. Darryl Smith has to be a serious contender. So many candidates referred to Columbia City when asked about civil rights and outreach: Darryl was/is an integral part of making CC what it is.

A few candidates stood out today, many did not. I hope Darryl continues next week and is chosen for the seat.

I watched some of it on the Seattle
Channel too. I was impressed by
how little difference there is between
the contenders and the current sitting
council members. Each contender appears
to have their pet interest, however outside
of that, they and the council members seem
the same. Boring and likely ineffective
again in 2006.

It almost makes one wish a rabid Republican was in the mix just to shake the City Council up a bit, however as I predicted before, they
will go with someone safe and predictible.....which is just another reason supporting district representation.

---Jensen



What a scuzz bucket!!

Daryl Smith actually cited Casa Latina as an example of how he works together with other communities. This from a guy who organized the NIMBYS to run CASA out of the Rainier Valley. What a dishonest sack of...

No wonder he is Vulcan's favoite. It doesnt take much to impress this city.

What a scuzz bucket!!

Daryl Smith actually cited Casa Latina as an example of how he works together with other communities. This from a guy who organized the NIMBYS to run CASA out of the Rainier Valley. What a dishonest sack of...

No wonder he is Vulcan's favoite. It doesnt take much to impress this city.

SEME-

Just curious, but did you attend any of the public meetings regarding Casa Latina?

I did. Not because I was against them relocating but rather I wanted to learn more about the issue.

The meetings were volatile at best. Anyone who dared question the plan was attacked, vilified.

Darryl Smith was one of many who had questions. I had questions. Casa's plan had lots of holes in it, lots of unknowns- questions were needed.

And no one "ran" Casa out of the Rainier Valley. Actually, many, many people worked to find a better fit, whether that was in Rainier Valley or somewhere else.

For the reord, I am not impressed easily. But as far as this candidate, I am- I've done my research and do not just throw my support about on a whim.

Yes, I was there, at several of them, actually.

No one was vilified, people expressed their points of view, and others disagreed. Settle down.

Actually if you recall, the "other side" at some point ( in the Mount Baker meeting) referred to the CASA workers as "garbage". They even had videos showing the CASA workers standing outside Belltown looking menancing. Very Xenophobic stuff, if you ask me, but hey, everyone is allowed their point of view.

Look, you can oppose CASA and look for a "better fit" or whatever rosy name you want to call it, the city made a deal and Casa took it because of the funding that the city had attatched to it.

Look man, it is certainly your right to oppose and run a group you dont want out of a neighborhood, it is your right to say its not a fit ( whatever that means)but dont claim that that is 'working together' It is not. It is, on the other hand, working together with the NIMBYS and the Mount Baker folks and the chamber and whoever else, but it is not working with CASA and the Latino community. That was my point, not to debate if somebody was vilified or not, or wether opposing CASA was right or not, the issue is over, you won, and as far as I know you guys and Darryl arent looking for another good fit for CASA, and dont claim that you are, because you know you're not, and please dont claim you worked with CASA.

For the record, the place is still empty (Chubby and Tubby) and the drug dealers are across the street and the group(s) that " were so concerned with CASA bringing drunks' is not out protesting that market across the CHubby and Tubby site, I know because I live down the street.

One thing I hate is, my first instinct is to write or call my city coucilperson, as I did in other towns, to weigh in with my opinion on the candidates... but I don't have a dedicated councilperson for my geographic area-- I'd have to call and write every g-dman one of them.

SEME-

Regarding this statement-

and as far as I know you guys and Darryl arent looking for another good fit for CASA, and dont claim that you are, because you know you're not..

Several groups have indeed been working to find Casa a more ideal location. I know negotiations are underway to secure a site. And I know this because I live near the proposed building.

Regarding Casa Latina:

I live in a building on the street corner which was likely cited by those who hoped to keep Casa Latina out of CC. Casa Latina runs a work program down the street and around the corner from my building. Men, mostly latinos, wait there for work. It is organized. I don't have any problem with them.
Around the corner towards 1st and Bell are men, mostly latino, who are not in their program. They are almost all undocumented. These men mix with drug addicts and homeless from the area. The men looking for work are decent folks, but among them are the drugged addled, who are so high they harrass and physically threaten people who live in my neighborhood.
Folks from CC have good reason to ask AS MANY QUESTIONS AS THEY CAN before inviting this group to their neighborhood. Some social service agencies don't give a shit about their neighborhood, some do. Casa needs to show how they'll handle the problems related to their work. Don't let CC inherit the problems we have in Belltown.

The lanes on the Viaduct are so narrow that I'm terrified to be on it after hearing so many drivers talk about how much they "enjoy the view."

Keep your eye on the road and your car in your own damn lane.

And tear the fucking thing down already—hell, if we lived in a real city a Teamster who was about to retire would back a cement truck into one of the Viaduct's support columns in the middle of the night and take the damn thing out. He would not only create jobs for his union brothers, and be hero, but also help speed up the bullshit "process."

Belltowner-

Thank you for your insight. With regards to the Casa meetings, I felt people weren't questioning their program- it's a fabulous program with a compassionate mission- what people seem to be questioning was the segment of people who are present (or nearby) who are NOT affiliate with the Casa program.

Unfortunately for Casa, their ED basically said that wouldn't be a problem. She never addressed how their organization would handle those who might loiter about who are NOT part of the Casa program; her standard reply was it wouldn't be a problem.

People simply wanted to know Casa's plan. Why this line of questioing was interpreted as racist or NIMBYism is beyond me.

Again, Belltowner, thank you for bringing your perspective.

1)I never said people couldn’t ask all the questions they want. Hell, they did.

2)I never said people couldn’t oppose CASA Latina, Hell they did.

3)The problem in Belltown, drunks, druggies, men whistling at women, people pissing, and ( yuck) people pooping WAS THERE before CASA Latina got that sitein Belltown, it was there before the Nice condos went up and all the low income housing went away, and it will be there LONG after CASA Latina leaves, and according to SPD reports CASA Latina did not bring that “problem” there so Belltowner will have his Problem long after CASA Latina leaves

4)The point I made is Darryl ORGANIZED the opposition and some of those opposing CASA LATINA were Xenophobic and hateful, I never said he was. All I said is HE DIDN’T work with CASA LATINA like he claimed. HE opposed it, as is his right, as is your right to oppose it.

5)The ED and others from CASA LATINA explained how they would have addressed the concern of folks loitering. Businesspeople from Belltown testified that CASA LATINA would not be bringing the “trouble makers” with them.

6)Ilegals? Hmm, I had no idea, some people on SLOG have been deputized by ICE and Homeland security to check work permits, or other documents. For the sake of keeping them informed, some people that hold Work permits and not green cards ( pink now) are considered documented.


7)Nobody is looking for a new site for CASA Latina, that is a lie. The city said that last year in their press release.

I am not debating whether CASA was or not a good fit, you people think it was not, and you won, and I’m saying it was and I (we) lost. End of story. I am simply saying that Darryl was dishonest when citing to the council CASA Latina as an example of working with the Latino community. Is not true. He represented your views as an organizer of this effort and that is perfectly ok, but he did not Work together with the Latino community, that is simply a lie.

Very interesting and professional site! Good luck!

Holla and Happy Thanksgiving.

Hi there! Your site is cool!

Follow your dreams, you can reach your goals.

This site is a lot of fun very well designed.

I like your website alot...its lots of fun... you have to help me out with mine...

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).