Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

Archives for 01/20/2006 - 01/20/2006

Friday, January 20, 2006

Get Your Stranger Valentine In!

Posted by on January 20 at 10:17 PM

Your girlfriend, boyfriend, sugar daddy, Mistress, mistress, lover, husband, secret crush, partner, wife, best friend, fat spoiled cat, etc., would be thrilled if you took a moment from your day to compose a little valentine for him or her. It’s free and it’s easy. Go to www.thestranger.com/seattle/valentines and fill out the form. We’ll print your love note in the February 9 issue of the paper. There will be no good excuse for you if your lover searches the Valentine’s Issue in vain.

NOTE TO PROCRASTINATORS: The deadline for valentines is NOON on Friday, February 3. (Your “I missed the deadline” excuse won’t suffice this year, baby.)

Today’s Lesson: America is Screwed

Posted by on January 20 at 10:16 PM

I began today with a brief stop at Bartell’s. As I was checking out (chocolate, toothpaste, and batteries), a young male employee (overeager, glasses, hair with product) had the following exchange with a middle-aged woman employee (tired, glasses, no product):

“Good morning!” he shouted.
“Good morning,” she replied.
“I saw you coming out of the elevator!”
“Oh really?”
“Yeah, I came running and shouting at you!”
“Oh. I didn’t notice.”
“Yeah, I was running!”
[awkward silence.]
“I guess I didn’t notice. I guess you could’ve been a rapist.”
[awkward silence.]
“Yeah,” she repeated. “A rapist. And I wouldn’t have even noticed.”

He nodded awkwardly, probably feeling as nauseated as I wasit was a bit early in the morning for rape jokesand life went on. Was she trying to tell us something? Tell him something?

I ended today, ironically enough, at Cowgirls, Inc., where I rode the mechanical bull. I’ve never been to the Inc. before, never even considered going, but the staff was nice, the jukebox was rockin’ (in an AC/DC and Zep kind of way), and the mechanical bull was great fun. It jerked in unexpected directions and dared me to keep my balance. I eventually fell offeverybody doestried to look cool leaving the bullpen and ordered a beer from a woman dancing on the bar. And I thought: “I review plays all the time. I wish they were as unpredictable as that mechanical bull.” And then I thought: “If an art form is more predictable than a mechanical bull, it’s in bad trouble.”

By the way: Did you hear about the honors-student high school debater who got in serious, serious trouble for simply positing, in a discussion, that one example of violent revolutionary protest would be to plant a bomb in the school? And his principal, a very popular, and by all accounts effective, woman got fired for not reporting him to the police? He didn’t threaten anything, as far as we can tell from the news reports. He was just illustrating a point.

Remember: The ragtag American army won the Revolution because it was fast, adaptive, guerilla, and creative, while the Brits lost because they were orderly, mechanized, and disciplined. The famous anecdote from when I was a schoolboy in Lexington, MA, went like this: During the Revolutionary War, British troops would march in formation down a country road while American snipers sat in trees. The snipers would pick off soldiers one by one, killing some troops and terrorizing the rest, while the ever-stoic Brits couldn’t break ranks and fire back unless their commandersat the head of the phalanx, who never noticedordered them to. This was a very effective strategy for the Americans.

In conclusion, today’s events have indicated that America has lost the nimble, creative, no-holds-barred virtues that made it the most artistically, intellectually, and militarily powerful country in the world. Now we’re repressed (rape “joke”), mechanized (art vs. bull), bureaucratic (punishing kids and principals for a hypothetical), and stupid.

We’re totally fucked.

In Case Anyone Was Wondering…

Posted by on January 20 at 7:40 PM

…whatever happened to Cherie Currie of the Runaways.

Focus on the Family: No Comment on Whether it Supports Rev. Hutcherson’s Boycott

Posted by on January 20 at 6:18 PM

I spoke several times today with Gwen Stein, who works in the public relations daprtment at Focus on the Family’s headquarters in Colorado Springs. She sounded like a very nice woman, and I told her I had a very simple question: Does Focus on the Family support Rev. Hutcherson’s national boycott?

Ms. Stein very nicely told me that a representative of her department would be happy to call me back and answer the question, if such a person could find the time to do so before the close of business in Colorado today. Now, I don’t think it’s a difficult matter for an organization like Focus on the Family to determine whether it supports a national boycott of several major American corporations several days after said boycott has been announced by the Associated Press.

Hutcherson said he has the support of several national organizations, including the Family Research Council, Southern Baptist Convention and Focus on the Family. Several of those organizations’ offices could not be reached after hours Monday.

But given five hours, Focus on the Family proved unable to call me back and tell me whether the above was true. Which I interpret as “no comment.” And which I also interpret as a bad sign for the truth of the above.

Keeping in mind that Focus on the Family is not generally shy about letting people know when it does support particular political actions, let’s tally up where Rev. Hutcherson’s “national boycott,” as he described it to the AP, currently stands:

Did Rev. Hutcherson announce the “national boycott” on Focus on the Family’s national radio program on Thursday, as he told the AP he would? No. Does the AP agree with Rev. Hutcherson’s claim that he was misquoted by the AP about the Thursday broadcast? No. Does the Family Research Council support Rev. Hutcherson’s boycott, as he told the AP? No. Does the Southern Baptist Convention support Rev. Hutcherson’s boycott, as he told the AP? No. Does Focus on the Family support Rev. Hutcherson’s boycott, as he told the AP? No Comment.

That’s some national boycott.

More Council Intrigue

Posted by on January 20 at 6:17 PM

If the council doesn’t decide on a president next Monday, January 23, the presidency could become an issue in their choice of a new council member, expected to wrap up next Thursday. And, since the council plans to interview council candidates in private, one-on-one interviews (something even public-meeting supporter Peter Steinbrueck does not oppose), council members could ask candidates who they would support as council president and no one would ever know about it - adding an unseemly political dimension to what has already been a lightning-speed, closed-door process.

Gay Rappers: Too Real For Hip-Hop?

Posted by on January 20 at 5:48 PM

Through this thread on the I Love Music message board, I just discovered an interesting article on gay rappers written by Toure in the April 20, 2003 New York Times. You can find it here without having to pay NYT for the privilege. Here’s an excerpt:

Hip-hop is now as large a cultural stage as baseball was in the 50’s, yet the mainstream is just as closed to gay rappers as the major leagues were to black men before Robinson. And, as with Robinson, for Caushun to break through could have a profound impact on how gay people are perceived throughout America.

Caushun recently signed with Baby Phat Records, and his debut album, “Shock and Awe,” will come out at the end of June before Gay Pride Day. His self-confidence is so strong that he doesn’t believe his being gay will keep him from selling a million records and having a video played on MTV 20 times a week — in other words, from becoming a star.

Anybody heard that Caushun album? He’s neither in the allmusic.com nor the discogs.com databases, which leads me to believe that the album never came out (even though the rapper did).

Gay Civil Rights Bill Passes the House, 60 - 37

Posted by on January 20 at 5:35 PM

Next, the state senate:

With Friday’s House vote the bill proceeds to the upper chamber, where Majority Leader Sen. Lisa Brown, D-Spokane, has said the upper chamber will act on the bill quickly.

Need something to do this weekend?

Posted by on January 20 at 5:34 PM

First of all, tonight Speaker Speaker are playing at Neumo’s with Super Deluxe. I LOVE Speaker Speaker, they’re currently one of my local favorites and they remind me a bit of Sicko (yay!). You can check out their infectious power pop here.

And tomorrow, the all-ages crowd should be happy to hear that a handful of really fantastic local bands are playing on the Eastside at Kirkland’s Teen Union Building (www.ktub.org)The Divorce, Super Deluxe, Young Sportsmen, and the Conversation Heart play at 7 pm for $7.

I just got turned onto the Young Sportsmen not too long ago, and boy are they great. See what I have to say about them and the Divorce in this week’s Underage column.

What’s real?

Posted by on January 20 at 5:14 PM

The debate over authenticity in books (see all the James Frey debate) has spilled over into the world of music. Check out Chris Parker’s piece for the Stranger on keeping it real in music here.

Steinbrueck Keeps it Public

Posted by on January 20 at 5:09 PM

Here are the latest picks from City Council Member Steinbrueck. He keeps lefty lefty Juan Bocanegra in the mix! as the list gets whittled down to the 6.

Once again, I am posting with the stranger my short list of candidates for the city council position. the follow “stellar” candidates, not order of preference, will be named by me at the council’s Monday morning meeting:

Ross Baker
Juan Bocanegra
Gail Chiarello
Stella Chao
Sharon Maeda
Venus Velazquez

your humble public servant,

peter

“Drop It Like It’s Hot”

Posted by on January 20 at 4:34 PM


I just received a most amazing Hot Tip from luxury-class Hot Tipper Keith Bacon, whose eyewitness report so fucked with my being I can’t justify tampering with it in any way:

Last Saturday I was at the Double Header ”Seattle’s oldest gay bar,” but usually populated by street drunks and sports fans. When I went to the restroom, there was a guy taking a dump in a stall with NO DOOR. And the john was sorta pushed forward so he was basically in plain view. I hid at the farthest urinal away from him, which thankfully had a small “privacy shield.” But then this other guy comes in, stands between us, and starts TALKING TO THE GUY TAKING A DUMP. It went like this:

Guy: (looking at Dumper) Mmm. Man, that’s the worst. You must really gotta go.

Dumper: When you gotta go you gotta go, knowwhatI’msaying?

Guy: I heard that! You gotta drop it, whatcha gonna do?

Dumper: Drop it like it’s hot!

Guy: Heh heh, that’s right: drop it like it’s HOT!

At this point my head exploded and I ran out of the bathroom as the two
guys laughed at me for laughing at them.

I swear it’s 100% true.

Thanks to Keith for surviving and sharing.
Now I must have a full-body skin transplant.

Rob Dickinson of Catherine Wheel

Posted by on January 20 at 3:40 PM

I was a big Catherine Wheel fan in my teen years, and when I heard former frontman Rob Dickinson has since gone solo and was coming to town, I was really curious and planned to go to the show (he played the Crocodile last night). Sadly, fluish symptoms kept me at home and on the couch, so if anyone went, I’d love to hear about it. Did he play CW songs? All original material? Someone please fill me in! If I missed hearing a solo acousitic version of “Black Metallic,” I might cry a little bit…

Re: Mr. Mirman

Posted by on January 20 at 2:50 PM

Perhaps enough has been said about Eugene Mirman over the past couple days, but I just want to quickly second Brendan’s www.eugenemirman.com recommendation, but also suggest you take a few minutes to watch some of his videos too. “Pot Video” and “Sexpert” are two of my favorites. “Scotch and Soda” is great too.

“Women love danger. If they could, they’d just date a fire!”

Sooooo funny.

Don’t Tread on Wiley

Posted by on January 20 at 2:42 PM

Recently, I wrote a review of Seattle Repertory Theatre’s Restoration Comedy, which was based on two plays of the Restoration period. I said:

Amy Freed’s Restoration Comedy isn’t a meta-commentary on the frivolous plays of the 17th century so much as a CliffsNotes version of two such playsColley Cibber’s Love’s Last Shift and John Vanbrugh’s snarky response The Relapsestripped of their verbal gymnastics and inconvenient subplots and crammed with physical comedy and modern clichés.

Turns out the publisher of CliffsNotesexcuse me, CLIFFSNOTES® study guideshas a troupe of Googling monkeys monitoring the web for trademark infringement, because yesterday we got this letter:

Re: Trademark Infringement of CLIFFSNOTES®

To Whom It May Concern:

Wiley Publishing, Inc. (“Wiley”), publisher of the well-known and well-regarded CLIFFSNOTES® series of study guides recently became aware of The Stranger’s use of the CLIFFSNOTES® trademark in The Stranger theater listings, posted on its web site at http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Listings?oid=25727.

As you may know, Wiley has over 20 trademark registrations in the United States and other countries for the CLIFFSNOTES® trademark, including CLIFFS®, CLIFFS NOTES®, CLIFFSAP®, and CLIFFSNOTES.COM®. The CLIFFSNOTES® series has been in existence since 1958 and has enjoyed tremendous success.

Due to the significant efforts undertaken by Wiley to promote and protect its trademarks, and because of the potential for confusion or dilution regarding the CLIFFSNOTES® mark in the manner The Stranger has used Wiley’s trademark…

We ask that you refer to CLIFFSNOTES® as “CliffsNotes study guides” in any future editorials or articles.

Wiley asks for it, Wiley gets it. Here is the new, improved review of Restoration Comedy, which has closed at the Rep but will enjoy a run at California Shakespeare Theater in July:

Amy Freed’s Restoration Comedy isn’t a meta-commentary on the frivolous plays of the 17th century so much as a CLIFFSNOTES® study guides version of two such playsColley Cibber’s Love’s Last Shift and John Vanbrugh’s snarky response The Relapsestripped of their verbal gymnastics and inconvenient subplots and crammed with physical comedy and modern clichés.

Much better.

entertainment for the whole family

Posted by on January 20 at 2:36 PM

Salon’s daily fix is as wise as it is addictingly trashy, but a pain in the ass to get to.

So please, savor along with me, gentle reader:

The secret profanity of “40-Year-Old Virgin” revealed: Screen It, a Web site ostensibly devoted to parents concerned about the content of Hollywood movies, bills itself as “an unbiased, easy to use, yet heavily detailed and complete look at popular entertainment your kids might see, rent, or buy.” But in protecting kids from smut, the people behind Screen It have had to learn to wallow in it. See their painstaking assessment of “The 40-Year-Old Virgin” for an example of just what “heavily detailed” means. Their rundown of the film’s profanity: “At least 68 ‘f’ words (2 used with ‘mother,’ 16 used sexually as are phrases such as ‘laid,’ ‘nail,’ ‘screw,’ ‘do it,’ ‘get it on’ and ‘tap’), 29 ‘s’ words, 19 slang terms using female genitals (‘p*ssy,’ variations of that word and ‘poon,’ and ‘tw*t’), 15 using male ones (‘d*ck,’ ‘c*ck,’ ‘c*cks*cker’ and ‘pogo stick’), 4 slang terms for breasts (variation of ‘t*tty’), 17 asses (2 used with ‘hole’), 4 hells, 3 damns, 1 S.O.B., 15 uses of ‘Oh my God,’ 8 of ‘God,’ 4 of ‘Oh God,’ 3 of ‘My God,’ 2 each of ‘G-damn’ and ‘Swear to God’ and 1 use each of ‘For God’s sakes’ and ‘Oh Jesus Christ.’ ” Oddly, the site also includes a number of possibly imitative phrases to watch out for that range from “F*ck your mother” to the seemingly innocuous (or laden with hidden meaning?) “Forty is the new twenty.” For even more awkwardly precise descriptions, see the “Sex/Nudity” section of the site’s “Brokeback Mountain” review.

After perusing the website, I can attest that Screen It! answers the important questions on every parent’s mind, such as Just how sadistic is “Hostel” and is it appropriate for anyone? Unfortunately, you have to become a member to reap all of the hilarious rewards of this site, but here is a teaser of the Screen It Family’s take on Brokeback Mountain:

After a night of drinking, Ennis decides to sleep outside, but after his fire dies down, he’s freezing and Jack tells him to join him in the warmer tent. As they lie side by side, Jack pulls Ennis’ arm around him and then tries to kiss him several times, but Ennis is slightly resistant (pushing him away, but obviously interested). Jack’s pants are then undone and he turns with his rear toward Ennis who pulls down Jack’s pants (we briefly see the side of his bare butt). Ennis then undoes his own pants, spits on his fingers (for lubricant) and then puts his hand down toward his crotch (we don’t see the actual act). We then see him thrusting behind Jack (rear entry anal intercourse) with related sounds, but no nudity or full shots of the encounter.

Their description feels very National Geographic, somehow. And now I have an odd longing for Screen It! to narrate my next sexual encounter, preferably with a British accent. I wonder, do they take requests?

I, Drunk Idiot at Dead Can Dance Show

Posted by on January 20 at 2:32 PM

We just got a nice, penitent I, Anonymous from someone who apparently made a complete ass of him- or herself at last fall’s Dead Can Dance show at the Paramount.

Better late than never. Enjoy!

A Curious Comic in the Seattle Times

Posted by on January 20 at 2:16 PM

Check out today’s Prickly City, one of the many forgettable comics that run in the Seattle Times:

prc060120.jpg

In case you can’t read it: Two children are walking past a movie theater showing Brokeback Mountain.

“Yeesh, a kissin’ cowboy movie!”

“Somewhere, John Wayne is weeping…”

“John Wayne cried?”

“Of course not. Buf if he did, he would…”

Americablog is currently slapping around the Washington Post for running the same cartoon…

You see, a movie about gay people is gross and very unmanly, and thus a movie that showed gay people as normal suffering human beings is something that a real American like John Wayne would be disgusted with. And apparently the Washington Post has no problem publishing bigoted attacks against gays and lesbians because, on a page frequented by children no less, so they published the cartoon.

The Seattle Times is pro-gay marriage, and earlier this week Nicole Brodeur slapped Rev. Hutcherson for his anti-gay antics. Why would they run this bigoted cartoon?


Last Days Remainder Roundup

Posted by on January 20 at 2:00 PM

Despite my frequent professions of “nothing happened today,” Last Days is actually never at a loss for material, just space. But thanks to the unfillable vastness of the internet, those Last Days-worthy items that don’t make the cut for the column can now enjoy life on Slog.

First is this week’s Last Days Remainder Roundup is a fascinating case reported by the New York Law Journal, concerning one Jerry Colaitis, a prominent New York furrier whose path to Last Days began back in January 2001, when Colaitis, his wife, and several family members went to the high-octane Japanese eatery Benihana for a birthday dinner. Trouble came in the form of a flying shrimp, tossed at Mr. Colaitis by his table-side hibachi chef. Here things get muddy: One side says Mr. Colatis was trying to dodge the shrimp; the other side says Colaitis was trying to catch it in his mouth. Either way, Colaitis threw out his neck, with the injury requiring surgery. Following this surgery, Colaitis developed a related infection which required another surgery. Two months later, Jerry Colaitis died of a blood-borne infection. And now his wife is seeking $10 million in damagesfrom Benihana. Ridiculous full story here.

Speaking of New York curiosities: On both my outgoing and return flights to and from NYC last week, I was seated directly behind the same man. More importantly, I recognized the man by his promotional yarmulke, an otherwise standard saucer-sized head cover emblazoned with the Windows XP logo. Are promotional yarmulkes common? Or was this a yarmulke anomaly? If anyone knows anything, please share.

Finally, this Hot Tip from Hot Tipper Danielle:

While waiting outside the Wayward Café on 9th and 55th, I witnessed a woman lean back against the window in her booth while her husband/boyfriend/whatever leaned in with his army knife to clip a stray nose hair from the hippy chick’s nose. This went on for about 30 seconds until the hair was finally clipped. It then turned into a discussion about how difficult it was to clip it, and how she thought she’d gotten it earlier but didn’t, and will cutting it make it grow faster and should she have pulled it instead? I was too close to avoid seeing it, and they were too loud to ignore the conversation.

Thank you, Danielle. Everyone else, see you next week.

Misidentity Politics

Posted by on January 20 at 1:31 PM

Seattle City Council Members are making a big deal about choosing a woman from a minority community to fill the current vacancy. “We need another female, and it would help to have another person of color,” Council Member David Della told the Seattle Times.

There are a bunch of obvious reasons to criticize this childish bit of identity politics.

But first, consider this reason: While Council Members like Della are grandstanding on this issue to score some easy points with NPR Liberal Seattle, I’d like to point out that the current minority council members (Richard McIver & David Della) and women council members (Jan Drago & Jean Godden) make up the council’s conservative bloc. It’s three white men (Nick Licata, Peter Steinbrueck, and Richard Conlin) who make up the council’s progressive bloc…and most often take on Greg Nickels’ big development agenda.

Southern Baptist Convention: We’re Not Supporting Rev. Hutcherson’s Boycott

Posted by on January 20 at 1:15 PM

The list of incorrect things that Rev. Hutcherson told the AP keeps growing. Jill Martin, spokeswoman for the public policy arm of the Southern Baptist Convention, tells me that the SBC is not backing Rev. Hutcherson.

“We have no record of the SBC having a position on the boycott,” she says.

Again, that’s not what Rev. Hutcherson told the Associated Press:

Hutcherson said he has the support of several national organizations, including the Family Research Council, Southern Baptist Convention and Focus on the Family. Several of those organizations’ offices could not be reached after hours Monday.

I asked Martin why Rev. Hutcherson would have told the AP that the Southern Baptist Convention was backing him when it wasn’t.

I don’t know,” she told me. “I think that you need to talk to Pastor Hutcherson and his church about his comments.”

Interesting Coincidence

Posted by on January 20 at 1:04 PM

Council members Jan Drago, Richard McIver and Jean Godden voted for the exact same city council candidates eight times (out of a total of 10 to 12 votes). In comparison, the council’s more liberal bloc - Peter Steinbrueck, Nick Licata, and Richard Conlin, voted for the same candidate just three times.

Family Research Council: We’re Not Supporting Rev. Hutcherson’s Boycott

Posted by on January 20 at 1:00 PM

Amber Hildebrand, a spokeswoman for the conservative Family Research Council, tells me that FRC is not backing Rev. Hutcherson’s boycott of companies that support Washington State’s gay civil rights bill.

“Hutcherson is a good friend of FRC,” Hildebrand told me. “FRC opposes laws protecting people based on the language of ‘sexual orientation.’ But FRC is not participating in the boycott. We don’t participate in any boycotts.”

Funny, that’s not what Rev. Hutcherson told the Associated Press:

Hutcherson said he has the support of several national organizations, including the Family Research Council, Southern Baptist Convention and Focus on the Family. Several of those organizations’ offices could not be reached after hours Monday.

But at this point, I’m not surprised that yet another thing Rev. Hutcherson told the AP isn’t checking out.

What Happens Now

Posted by on January 20 at 12:54 PM

The city council selection process is about to become less public than ever.

Over the weekend, city council members will narrow down their choices to fill council position #9; on Monday, the council will meet to name their picks, compile the lists, and narrow them down to approximately six finalists. Then, according to city clerk Judith Pippin, the council will likely recess the meeting, allowing council members to interview candidates in one-on-one, private meetings or go into a (closed) executive session to discuss the candidates’ qualifications.

I called City Attorney Tom Carr’s office to see what the law says about holding executive sessions to discuss a candidate for public office. Elected officials frequently go into executive sessions to discuss potential employees or board appointments, but it seems to me that a candidate for city council - someone who will represent me, as opposed to someone who merely works for me - is different.

As it turns out, there is such a law: RCW 42.30.110, which says governing bodies can go into executive session “to evaluate the qualifications of a candidate for appointment to elective office.” OK. So the executive sessions, though troubling (the council doesn’t plan to hold a single public meeting before making this very important decision) are legally defensible.

However: The RCW continues, “any interview of such candidate to elective office shall be in a meeting open to the public.”

Hmm. So how is it that council members are holding private meetings with council candidates when state law explicitly says that such meetings shall be public? City Attorney Tom Carr’s spokeswoman didn’t know; she’s getting back to me on that.

Meanwhile: Just because the council can talk about candidates in closed session, that doesn’t mean they should. From start to finish, the process of choosing a new council member will take just under three weeks. Shouldn’t a decision as important as this one involve at least a little public process?

Bradybunch Mountain

Posted by on January 20 at 12:19 PM

There goes the neighborhood:

From ‘Brady Bunch’ to wild bunch Christopher Knight and Barry Williams, who played clean-cut brothers Peter and Greg Brady on “The Brady Bunch,” will portray gay lovers on “That ’70s Show.” Knight, 47, and Williams, 51, have already shot the episode, in which they move next door to Topher Grace’s TV family, a Fox rep confirmed to us. Word is the former Brady siblings may even share a kiss. It would have been unthinkable in 1969, when the Bradys began their five-year run. Back then, you never saw Greg kiss any of the many girls he dated. The word “sex” wasn’t mentioned until the series’ final episode. Network censors wouldn’t even let us see the family’s toilet. We can just see the Bradys’ housekeeper, Alice (Ann B. Davis), breaking up the boys’ lip-lock with her broom. In real life, Williams has been married twic e. Knight, who was the best man at one of those weddings, has also been wed twice. Knight’s recent romance with “America’s Next Top Model” Adrienne Curry, 23, was chronicled on VH1’s “My Fair Brady.” (In the new Playboy, she calls their sex life “elaborate” and “exhibitionist.”) His TV fling with Williams is due to air in April

(Thanks goes to Bellen Drake for sending me this piece of enlightenment.)

He’s Baaaack. And Now He Doesn’t Like The Gays

Posted by on January 20 at 12:06 PM

As usual Tim Eyman’s got a slew of initiatives queued up.

There’s one preventing the legislature from raising taxes without a 2/3 majority vote. There’s one keeping car tabs at $30. There’s one that opens up carpool lanes during non-rush hours and mandates that all car taxes go to roads only. And there’s one prohibiting affirmative action.

Eyman updated the anti-affirmative action one yesterday, adding this language:

The commission may not require anyone to grant quotas, set-asides, or other preferential treatment for any individual or group based on sexual orientation or sexual preference. The specific protected classes under this chapter shall not include sexual orientation or sexual preference.

Basically, Eyman is trying to preempt the gay civil rights bill, which, for the first time in 30 years, looks like it’s going to pass.


Us Perverts Thought of that First

Posted by on January 20 at 12:00 PM

Michael Savage, the conservative radio talk show host, is a jackass, and he’s a little slow on the uptake. He thinks Brokeback Mountain is “disgusting” and “vile filth” and that every Hollywood movie “is about a sexual deviant, or a pervert, or about somebody who hates America, or a corrupt businessman” — read excerpts of his rant here — and to that end he’s trying to kick up trouble by renaming the movie Bareback Mounting.

Dude, we called it. That’s exactly what Annie Wagner titled her review three weeks before you came up with your pun. Although she thought the movie was “a gorgeous love story,” “fierce and convincing.”

(If you go to that link about Michael Savage’s rants, click on the link to the comments — they’re pretty good.)

What Is Soul?

Posted by on January 20 at 11:49 AM

Parliament-Funkadelic answer that question and then some in this rare 1969 footage of the world’s greatest psychedelic funk band, from around the time of their stone classic self-titled debut album. Band leader/vocalist George Clinton (sporting the suspenders and crazy hairstyle) must be trippin’ hard. Study and worship them, people.

Fuck the “Liberal” Media

Posted by on January 20 at 11:15 AM

Fuck CNN.

Fuck MSNBC.

Fuck the Washington Post.

Fuck CNN again and then fuck ‘em some more.

AP Reporter: “I Stand By the Reporting in My Story”

Posted by on January 20 at 10:45 AM

I just got off the phone with Rachel La Corte, the AP reporter who wrote the story in which Rev. Ken Hutcherson promised he would be leading a “national boycott” of companies supporting Washington’s gay civil rights bill a boycott that, on closer examination, seems not to exist.

Rev. Hutcherson told the AP on Monday that he would be announcing the boycott on Thursday on James Dobson’s national radio program, Focus on the Family, and the AP quickly pushed that news out over its wires. When the Thursday announcement never came, Rev. Hutcherson told me that the AP had its facts wrong.

Did the AP get its facts wrong?

“I stand by the reporting in my story,” La Corte told me.

She’s since talked to Rev. Hutcherson about all this and says: “He insists that I misunderstood him. I don’t feel that I misunderstood him.”

La Corte told me that before she spoke to Hutcherson on Monday, “He’d been trying to get ahold of me all weekend to let me know something he was going to do.” When they finally connected, he told her that he was going to be leading a national boycott of every single company (Microsoft, Boeing, Hewlett-Packard, Nike, Corbis, Vulcan, and RealNetworks) that signed a letter recently supporting Washington’s gay civil rights bill. She asked when he was going to make this announcement, and she says he replied:

“I’m going to be on the Focus on the Family show on Thursday.”

As it turned out, Rev. Hutcherson was not on the Focus on the Family show on Thursday. He was on a “drop-in” segment aired with the show on a few local stations in Washington not a great way to start a national boycott and didn’t even mention the boycott on the “drop-in.” Could Rev. Hutch’s vague language to the AP reporter have been a deliberate attempt to mislead her into giving him some national press?

“I’m not going to go into what his motives were, and what his intentions were,” La Corte told me. “I’m just standing by this story.”

Which raises an interesting question: When does a “national boycott” begin to exist? When Rev. Hutch promises the AP one is coming? When the AP reports that one’s coming?

“We find the show secondary to his announcement on Monday,” La Corte says. “Hundreds of millions of AP readers read that story across the country, so in essence, it was announced at that time.”

Here’s something else that was announced at that time via the AP story, and now sounds a little fishy:

Hutcherson said he has the support of several national organizations, including the Family Research Council, Southern Baptist Convention and Focus on the Family. Several of those organizations’ offices could not be reached after hours Monday.

Has La Corte heard back from the FRC or the Southern Baptists about whether they are, in fact, supporting this “national boycott”? She told me she hasn’t yet.

Will the AP be taking another look at this boycott to see if it actually exists, now that it’s been announced to “hundreds of millions” of readers? While she wouldn’t give an absolute yes or no, she did tell me:

“That’s something that we may end up doing a story on talking to all of these groups again to see where they stand.”

Maryland Court Backs Gay Marriage

Posted by on January 20 at 10:29 AM

A court in Maryland says banning same-sex marriage is sex discrimination, and is therefore unconstitutional.

A Baltimore Circuit Court judge ruled today that Maryland’s law against same-sex marriage “cannot withstand constitutional challenge,” a key ruling in the volatile national debate on gay rights.

“After much study and serious reflection, this court holds that Maryland’s statutory prohibition against same-sex marriage cannot withstand constitutional challenge,” Judge M. Brooke Murdock wrote in her decision… Murdock also wrote that “although tradition and societal values are important, they cannot be given so much weight that they alone will justify a discriminatory statutory classification.”

Doing My Part for America

Posted by on January 20 at 10:16 AM

Even though Google has refused to release internet search queries to the Bush administration, I thought I’d help Dubya out and release my own searches from the past week:

Bradley Steinbacher + The Stranger (vanity search)
Bradley Steinbacher + fuckwad (vanity search)
armpit + rash + cancer (hypochondria)
Rachel McAdams + naked (self-explanatory)
Dan Savage + naked (no explanation)
Resident Evil 4 + cheats (geekery)
scab + won’t heal + cancer (more hypochondria)
chronic pot smoking + loss of sex drive (girlfriend-requested search)
Bradley Steinbacher + “coiled sexual fury of a jungle cat” (no results)
Colin Farrell + naked (don’t ask)
Seattle Metro (self-explanatory)

For Keck’s Palm

Posted by on January 20 at 9:56 AM

“History…is not the theater of happiness. Periods of happiness are blank pages in it.” —Philosophy of History

Potty Prison

Posted by on January 20 at 9:52 AM

Good God:

A 73-YEAR-OLD woman is being investigated for “kidnapping and maltreating a family member” after allegedly keeping her mentally disturbed daughter locked in a darkened bathroom for 30 years.

Police said that Annina Gentilezza had kept her daughter, Giuseppina, now 52, a prisoner in the top-floor council flat at Pescara, on the Adriatic coast. They raided the flat after being tipped off by Signora Gentilezza’s daughter-in-law.

They found Giuseppina curled in a ball in a tiled room measuring 7ft x 9ft containing a lavatory, bidet, sink and washing machine. Wires hung from the ceiling where the light had been disconnected. The room contained a camp bed and plastic dog bowls in which Giuseppina was allegedly fed leftovers.

Police said that instead of being washed Giuseppina was “hosed down” on the balcony. Nicola Zupo, the officer who led the raid, said that Giuseppina was sometimes left out on the balcony as a punishment, especially in the winter, and beaten. She was allowed out once a month with her mother and stepfather, but only to collect her invalidity pension.

Full wretched story here.

Ken Hutcherson: Lying to the Associated Press?

Posted by on January 20 at 8:15 AM

Earlier this week, in a story picked up by local television stations and both major Seattle dailies, eastside Rev. Ken Hutcherson announced he is launching a nation-wide boycott of Microsoft, Boeing, Hewlett-Packard, and other companies that are supporting Washington’s gay civil rights bill. Here’s an excerpt from the Associated Press story that ran all over the nation:

The Rev. Ken Hutcherson, pastor of Antioch Bible Church in the Seattle suburb of Redmond, said he would formally issue the boycott Thursday on the conservative radio show Focus on the Family.

It would have been a big deal for Rev. Hutcherson to appear on James Dobson’s Focus on the Family radio show, which is part of the powerful religious right media machine and reaches nearly 9 million people across the country each week. Well, yesterday was Thursday. And the day came and went with no sign of Rev. Hutcherson on Dobson’s national broadcast, which instead explored the hot tactic of “Confronting Abortion Through Prayer.” What gives?

I called Focus on the Family’s headquarters in Colorado Springs, and found the people there very reluctant to explain why Rev. Hutcherson hadn’t been on Dobson’s national show as promised in the AP article. They did tell me, however, that Rev. Hutcherson was allowed to record a “drop-in” for the radio stations in Washington State that carry Dobson’s program. A “drop-in” is a short segment that can easily be added by local radio stations to the beginning of a pre-recorded broadcast like “Confronting Abortion Through Prayer.” Could I listen to the Washington “drop-in”? The answer from Dobson headquarters: No.

In the end, I did find a way to listen to Rev. Hutcherson’s “drop-in,” but before I get to what it contained (and conspicuously didn’t contain), a question for the Associated Press:

What kind of nation-wide boycott is launched on a few local radio stations in Washington State?

It seems Rev. Hutcherson, a very skillful media manipulator, may have tricked the AP into giving his “boycott” the kind of national audience that his buddy Dobson wasn’t willing to provide. If this is the case, will the AP correct the record?

Dobson headquarters had suggested I try one of the local AM radio stations here in Seattle for a copy of Rev. Hutcherson’s “drop-in,” and in short order I found Keith Black, the news director for KCIS radio, a local “Christian Inspiration Station” (AM630) that has fewer than 50,000 listeners.

Black played the “drop-in” for me over the phone, and it began with Tom Minery, the Vice President for Public Policy at Focus on the Family, telling listeners that he had “a special announcement for all of our listeners in the great state of Washington” about something that would be happening in the state senate “today.”

Did the announcement have anything to do with a national boycott? No. And was anything happening on the gay civil rights bill in the state senate on Thursday? No. The bill hasn’t even been taken up in the senate yet.

The rest of the four-minute “drop-in” consisted of Rev. Hutcherson telling listeners to call certain Washington State senators (Republican Bill Finkbeiner of Redmond, Democrat Marilyn Ramsussen of Yelm, and Democrat Mark Doumit of Aberdeen). “Call these senators and let them know we are against this bill,” Rev. Hutcherson said, warning that the bill was on a fast-track. Then Minery (incorrectly) told listeners that the bill is a “most significant matter that will be voted on today in the state capitol.”

And of course there were Rev. Hutcherson’s standard complaints about the gay civil rights struggle being compared to the black civil rights struggle, the standard religious right language of “special rights,” and warnings about Washington State becoming a “mecca” of gay marriage as a result of the bill (which has nothing to do with gay marriage).

Here’s what this sounds like to me: False information in the radio spot, false information in the AP report (which was picked up by The Seattle Times and Seattle Post-Intelligencer among others), and all of it adding up to another media manipulation victory for Rev. Hutcherson.

Again, I return to the question the AP and the newspapers that published this story should probably be asking:

Does this “national boycott” actually exist? Or did Rev. Hutcherson trick the press into splashing his name nationally when he knew even his buddy Dobson wasn’t going to?

UPDATE:

Attention Rachel La Corte of the Associated Press: I spoke to Rev. Hutcherson and he says you have your facts wrong.

The AP was wrong,” Rev. Hutcherson told me. “I never said I was going to announce a boycott today.”

So when will he announce his national boycott?

“I will let you know, Eli,” Rev. Hutcherson said. “I will let you know.”

While I wait for Rev. Hutcherson to let me know, I’d also like to know whether the AP agrees that it got his quotes wrong. The AP’s a pretty reliable organization, and I’d be surprised if they did. But this gives us a great opportunity to find out who’s more trustworthy: Rev. Ken Hutcherson, or the Associated Press?

FURTHER UPDATE:

Over at the blog horsesass.org, Goldy weighs in with some advice for media manipulators and a question for the Washington State press corps:

One thing I never do is lie or trick journalists into reporting something I know to be false. That would not only be rude and inconsiderate, it would destroy my credibility… Rev. Hutcherson now claims he never said he was going to announce a boycott today, and I suppose that AP reporter Rachel La Corte could have gotten it wrong. But if she didn’t, my question for her and the rest of the press corps is: “Are you ever going to trust Rev. Hutcherson again?