Slog - The Stranger's Blog

Line Out

The Music Blog

« Strangercrombie Blowout in Pic... | Brokeback Chattering »

Sunday, December 18, 2005

A la Valerie Plame

Posted by on December 18 at 14:30 PM

Yesterday, defending his authorization of domestic eavesdropping without first getting the required warrants, President Bush lectured:

The existence of this secret program was revealed in media reports after being improperly provided to news organizations. As a result, our enemies have learned information they should not have.

And the unauthorized disclosure of this effort damages our national security and puts our citizens at risk. Revealing classified information is illegal, alerts our enemies and endangers our country.

If Bush is so upset that someone “improperly provided” the story to news organizations, maybe he should put Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald on it and get yet another member of his administration indicted.

And just a little point of order on the merits of disclosing secrets to the press: It’s illegal for the government to eavesdrop without first getting a warrant. It’s not illegal— a la Valerie Plame—to be a CIA agent.


CommentsRSS icon

word.

maybe he should put Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald on it and get yet another member of his administration indicted.

Unless the leaker is in the legislative branch. Just saying.

If Bush thinks someone in the government did something "improper" (ie, illegal), then let's see him go after that person—Executive or legislative branch. Let's see him try and get Nancy Pelosi indicted for leaking that the U.S. Government has been spying on people.

I'd relish that showdown.

It's illegal for the government to eavesdrop without first getting a warrant. It's not illegal— a la Valerie Plame—to be a CIA agent.

Exactly, this is the main difference. And another difference is that revealing this information doesn't put anyone in danger (well, other than maybe the Bush Administration officials who could be in legal trouble).

"As a result, our enemies have learned information they should not have."

Now, whom does he really mean by "our enemies"? I guess we're supposed to think he means the terrsts, but I think we all know he means us.

Comments Closed

In order to combat spam, we are no longer accepting comments on this post (or any post more than 45 days old).